* [PATCH v14 1/8] bisect: move argument parsing before state modification.
2011-08-02 22:15 [PATCH v14 0/8] bisect: Add support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-02 22:15 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 2/8] bisect: use && to connect statements that are deferred with eval Jon Seymour
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-02 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: chriscool, gitster, j6t, jnareb, Jon Seymour
Currently 'git bisect start' modifies some state prior to checking
that its arguments are valid.
This change moves argument validation before state modification
with the effect that state modification does not occur
unless argument validations succeeds.
An existing test is changed to check that new bisect state
is not created if arguments are invalid.
A new test is added to check that existing bisect state
is not modified if arguments are invalid.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
---
git-bisect.sh | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 14 +++++++--
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index b2186a8..20f6dd5 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -60,6 +60,39 @@ bisect_autostart() {
bisect_start() {
#
+ # Check for one bad and then some good revisions.
+ #
+ has_double_dash=0
+ for arg; do
+ case "$arg" in --) has_double_dash=1; break ;; esac
+ done
+ orig_args=$(git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@")
+ bad_seen=0
+ eval=''
+ while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
+ arg="$1"
+ case "$arg" in
+ --)
+ shift
+ break
+ ;;
+ *)
+ rev=$(git rev-parse -q --verify "$arg^{commit}") || {
+ test $has_double_dash -eq 1 &&
+ die "$(eval_gettext "'\$arg' does not appear to be a valid revision")"
+ break
+ }
+ case $bad_seen in
+ 0) state='bad' ; bad_seen=1 ;;
+ *) state='good' ;;
+ esac
+ eval="$eval bisect_write '$state' '$rev' 'nolog'; "
+ shift
+ ;;
+ esac
+ done
+
+ #
# Verify HEAD.
#
head=$(GIT_DIR="$GIT_DIR" git symbolic-ref -q HEAD) ||
@@ -98,39 +131,6 @@ bisect_start() {
bisect_clean_state || exit
#
- # Check for one bad and then some good revisions.
- #
- has_double_dash=0
- for arg; do
- case "$arg" in --) has_double_dash=1; break ;; esac
- done
- orig_args=$(git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@")
- bad_seen=0
- eval=''
- while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
- arg="$1"
- case "$arg" in
- --)
- shift
- break
- ;;
- *)
- rev=$(git rev-parse -q --verify "$arg^{commit}") || {
- test $has_double_dash -eq 1 &&
- die "$(eval_gettext "'\$arg' does not appear to be a valid revision")"
- break
- }
- case $bad_seen in
- 0) state='bad' ; bad_seen=1 ;;
- *) state='good' ;;
- esac
- eval="$eval bisect_write '$state' '$rev' 'nolog'; "
- shift
- ;;
- esac
- done
-
- #
# Change state.
# In case of mistaken revs or checkout error, or signals received,
# "bisect_auto_next" below may exit or misbehave.
diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index b5063b6..b3d1b14 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -138,15 +138,23 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect start: back in good branch' '
grep "* other" branch.output > /dev/null
'
-test_expect_success 'bisect start: no ".git/BISECT_START" if junk rev' '
- git bisect start $HASH4 $HASH1 -- &&
- git bisect good &&
+test_expect_success 'bisect start: no ".git/BISECT_START" created if junk rev' '
+ git bisect reset &&
test_must_fail git bisect start $HASH4 foo -- &&
git branch > branch.output &&
grep "* other" branch.output > /dev/null &&
test_must_fail test -e .git/BISECT_START
'
+test_expect_success 'bisect start: existing ".git/BISECT_START" not modified if junk rev' '
+ git bisect start $HASH4 $HASH1 -- &&
+ git bisect good &&
+ cp .git/BISECT_START saved &&
+ test_must_fail git bisect start $HASH4 foo -- &&
+ git branch > branch.output &&
+ grep "* (no branch)" branch.output > /dev/null &&
+ test_cmp saved .git/BISECT_START
+'
test_expect_success 'bisect start: no ".git/BISECT_START" if mistaken rev' '
git bisect start $HASH4 $HASH1 -- &&
git bisect good &&
--
1.7.6.353.gb3ae7e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v14 2/8] bisect: use && to connect statements that are deferred with eval.
2011-08-02 22:15 [PATCH v14 0/8] bisect: Add support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 1/8] bisect: move argument parsing before state modification Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-02 22:15 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 3/8] bisect: add tests to document expected behaviour in presence of broken trees Jon Seymour
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-02 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: chriscool, gitster, j6t, jnareb, Jon Seymour
Christian Couder pointed out that the existing eval strategy
swallows an initial non-zero return. Using && to connect
the statements should fix this.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
---
git-bisect.sh | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index 20f6dd5..a44ffe1 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ bisect_start() {
0) state='bad' ; bad_seen=1 ;;
*) state='good' ;;
esac
- eval="$eval bisect_write '$state' '$rev' 'nolog'; "
+ eval="$eval bisect_write '$state' '$rev' 'nolog' &&"
shift
;;
esac
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ bisect_start() {
#
echo "$start_head" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START" &&
git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES" &&
- eval "$eval" &&
+ eval "$eval true" &&
echo "git bisect start$orig_args" >>"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG" || exit
#
# Check if we can proceed to the next bisect state.
--
1.7.6.353.gb3ae7e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v14 3/8] bisect: add tests to document expected behaviour in presence of broken trees.
2011-08-02 22:15 [PATCH v14 0/8] bisect: Add support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 1/8] bisect: move argument parsing before state modification Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 2/8] bisect: use && to connect statements that are deferred with eval Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-02 22:15 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 4/8] bisect: introduce support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-02 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: chriscool, gitster, j6t, jnareb, Jon Seymour
If the repo is broken, we expect bisect to fail.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
---
t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index b3d1b14..9ae2de8 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -581,5 +581,53 @@ test_expect_success 'erroring out when using bad path parameters' '
'
#
+# This creates a broken branch which cannot be checked out because
+# the tree created has been deleted.
#
+# H1-H2-H3-H4-H5-H6-H7 <--other
+# \
+# S5-S6'-S7'-S8'-S9 <--broken
+#
+# Commits marked with ' have a missing tree.
+#
+test_expect_success 'broken branch creation' '
+ git bisect reset &&
+ git checkout -b broken $HASH4 &&
+ git tag BROKEN_HASH4 $HASH4 &&
+ add_line_into_file "5(broken): first line on a broken branch" hello2 &&
+ git tag BROKEN_HASH5 &&
+ mkdir missing &&
+ :> missing/MISSING &&
+ git add missing/MISSING &&
+ git commit -m "6(broken): Added file that will be deleted"
+ git tag BROKEN_HASH6 &&
+ add_line_into_file "7(broken): second line on a broken branch" hello2 &&
+ git tag BROKEN_HASH7 &&
+ add_line_into_file "8(broken): third line on a broken branch" hello2 &&
+ git tag BROKEN_HASH8 &&
+ git rm missing/MISSING &&
+ git commit -m "9(broken): Remove missing file"
+ git tag BROKEN_HASH9 &&
+ rm .git/objects/39/f7e61a724187ab767d2e08442d9b6b9dab587d
+'
+
+echo "" > expected.ok
+cat > expected.missing-tree.default <<EOF
+fatal: unable to read tree 39f7e61a724187ab767d2e08442d9b6b9dab587d
+EOF
+
+test_expect_success 'bisect fails if tree is broken on start commit' '
+ git bisect reset &&
+ test_must_fail git bisect start BROKEN_HASH7 BROKEN_HASH4 2>error.txt &&
+ test_cmp expected.missing-tree.default error.txt
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'bisect fails if tree is broken on trial commit' '
+ git bisect reset &&
+ test_must_fail git bisect start BROKEN_HASH9 BROKEN_HASH4 2>error.txt &&
+ git reset --hard broken &&
+ git checkout broken &&
+ test_cmp expected.missing-tree.default error.txt
+'
+
test_done
--
1.7.6.353.gb3ae7e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v14 4/8] bisect: introduce support for --no-checkout option.
2011-08-02 22:15 [PATCH v14 0/8] bisect: Add support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 3/8] bisect: add tests to document expected behaviour in presence of broken trees Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-02 22:15 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain Jon Seymour
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-02 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: chriscool, gitster, j6t, jnareb, Jon Seymour
If --no-checkout is specified, then the bisection process uses:
git update-ref --no-deref HEAD <trial>
at each trial instead of:
git checkout <trial>
Improved-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
---
bisect.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
bisect.h | 2 +-
builtin/bisect--helper.c | 7 +++++--
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bisect.c b/bisect.c
index dd7e8ed..0427117 100644
--- a/bisect.c
+++ b/bisect.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct argv_array {
static const char *argv_checkout[] = {"checkout", "-q", NULL, "--", NULL};
static const char *argv_show_branch[] = {"show-branch", NULL, NULL};
+static const char *argv_update_ref[] = {"update-ref", "--no-deref", "HEAD", NULL, NULL};
/* bits #0-15 in revision.h */
@@ -707,16 +708,23 @@ static void mark_expected_rev(char *bisect_rev_hex)
die("closing file %s: %s", filename, strerror(errno));
}
-static int bisect_checkout(char *bisect_rev_hex)
+static int bisect_checkout(char *bisect_rev_hex, int no_checkout)
{
int res;
mark_expected_rev(bisect_rev_hex);
argv_checkout[2] = bisect_rev_hex;
- res = run_command_v_opt(argv_checkout, RUN_GIT_CMD);
- if (res)
- exit(res);
+ if (no_checkout) {
+ argv_update_ref[3] = bisect_rev_hex;
+ if (run_command_v_opt(argv_update_ref, RUN_GIT_CMD))
+ die("update-ref --no-deref HEAD failed on %s",
+ bisect_rev_hex);
+ } else {
+ res = run_command_v_opt(argv_checkout, RUN_GIT_CMD);
+ if (res)
+ exit(res);
+ }
argv_show_branch[1] = bisect_rev_hex;
return run_command_v_opt(argv_show_branch, RUN_GIT_CMD);
@@ -788,7 +796,7 @@ static void handle_skipped_merge_base(const unsigned char *mb)
* - If one is "skipped", we can't know but we should warn.
* - If we don't know, we should check it out and ask the user to test.
*/
-static void check_merge_bases(void)
+static void check_merge_bases(int no_checkout)
{
struct commit_list *result;
int rev_nr;
@@ -806,7 +814,7 @@ static void check_merge_bases(void)
handle_skipped_merge_base(mb);
} else {
printf("Bisecting: a merge base must be tested\n");
- exit(bisect_checkout(sha1_to_hex(mb)));
+ exit(bisect_checkout(sha1_to_hex(mb), no_checkout));
}
}
@@ -849,7 +857,7 @@ static int check_ancestors(const char *prefix)
* If a merge base must be tested by the user, its source code will be
* checked out to be tested by the user and we will exit.
*/
-static void check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad(const char *prefix)
+static void check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad(const char *prefix, int no_checkout)
{
const char *filename = git_path("BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK");
struct stat st;
@@ -868,7 +876,7 @@ static void check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad(const char *prefix)
/* Check if all good revs are ancestor of the bad rev. */
if (check_ancestors(prefix))
- check_merge_bases();
+ check_merge_bases(no_checkout);
/* Create file BISECT_ANCESTORS_OK. */
fd = open(filename, O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY, 0600);
@@ -908,8 +916,11 @@ static void show_diff_tree(const char *prefix, struct commit *commit)
* We use the convention that exiting with an exit code 10 means that
* the bisection process finished successfully.
* In this case the calling shell script should exit 0.
+ *
+ * If no_checkout is non-zero, the bisection process does not
+ * checkout the trial commit but instead simply updates HEAD.
*/
-int bisect_next_all(const char *prefix)
+int bisect_next_all(const char *prefix, int no_checkout)
{
struct rev_info revs;
struct commit_list *tried;
@@ -920,7 +931,7 @@ int bisect_next_all(const char *prefix)
if (read_bisect_refs())
die("reading bisect refs failed");
- check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad(prefix);
+ check_good_are_ancestors_of_bad(prefix, no_checkout);
bisect_rev_setup(&revs, prefix, "%s", "^%s", 1);
revs.limited = 1;
@@ -966,6 +977,6 @@ int bisect_next_all(const char *prefix)
"(roughly %d step%s)\n", nr, (nr == 1 ? "" : "s"),
steps, (steps == 1 ? "" : "s"));
- return bisect_checkout(bisect_rev_hex);
+ return bisect_checkout(bisect_rev_hex, no_checkout);
}
diff --git a/bisect.h b/bisect.h
index 0862ce5..22f2e4d 100644
--- a/bisect.h
+++ b/bisect.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct rev_list_info {
const char *header_prefix;
};
-extern int bisect_next_all(const char *prefix);
+extern int bisect_next_all(const char *prefix, int no_checkout);
extern int estimate_bisect_steps(int all);
diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
index 5b22639..d96a193 100644
--- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c
+++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
@@ -4,16 +4,19 @@
#include "bisect.h"
static const char * const git_bisect_helper_usage[] = {
- "git bisect--helper --next-all",
+ "git bisect--helper --next-all [--no-checkout]",
NULL
};
int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
{
int next_all = 0;
+ int no_checkout = 0;
struct option options[] = {
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "next-all", &next_all,
"perform 'git bisect next'"),
+ OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "no-checkout", &no_checkout,
+ "update HEAD instead of checking out the current commit"),
OPT_END()
};
@@ -24,5 +27,5 @@ int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
usage_with_options(git_bisect_helper_usage, options);
/* next-all */
- return bisect_next_all(prefix);
+ return bisect_next_all(prefix, no_checkout);
}
--
1.7.6.353.gb3ae7e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-02 22:15 [PATCH v14 0/8] bisect: Add support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 4/8] bisect: introduce support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-02 22:15 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 23:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-03 5:17 ` Christian Couder
2011-08-02 22:16 ` [PATCH v14 6/8] bisect: add tests for the --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-02 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: chriscool, gitster, j6t, jnareb, Jon Seymour
git-bisect can now perform bisection of a history without performing
a checkout at each stage of the bisection process. Instead, HEAD is updated.
One use-case for this function is allow git bisect to be used with
damaged repositories where git checkout would fail because the tree
referenced by the commit is damaged.
It can also be used in other cases where actual checkout of the tree
is not required to progress the bisection.
Improved-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
---
git-bisect.sh | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index a44ffe1..99a2637 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
USAGE='[help|start|bad|good|skip|next|reset|visualize|replay|log|run]'
LONG_USAGE='git bisect help
print this long help message.
-git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<pathspec>...]
+git bisect start [--no-checkout] [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<pathspec>...]
reset bisect state and start bisection.
git bisect bad [<rev>]
mark <rev> a known-bad revision.
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ require_work_tree
_x40='[0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f][0-9a-f]'
_x40="$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40"
+BISECT_MODE=$(test -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE" && cat "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE")
+
bisect_autostart() {
test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START" || {
(
@@ -69,6 +71,7 @@ bisect_start() {
orig_args=$(git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@")
bad_seen=0
eval=''
+ BISECT_MODE=
while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
arg="$1"
case "$arg" in
@@ -76,6 +79,11 @@ bisect_start() {
shift
break
;;
+ --no-checkout)
+ BISECT_MODE=--no-checkout;
+ shift ;;
+ --*)
+ die "$(eval_gettext "unrecognised option: '\$arg'")" ;;
*)
rev=$(git rev-parse -q --verify "$arg^{commit}") || {
test $has_double_dash -eq 1 &&
@@ -107,7 +115,11 @@ bisect_start() {
then
# Reset to the rev from where we started.
start_head=$(cat "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START")
- git checkout "$start_head" -- || exit
+ if test "$BISECT_MODE" = "--no-checkout"; then
+ git update-ref --no-deref HEAD "$start_head"
+ else
+ git checkout "$start_head" --
+ fi
else
# Get rev from where we start.
case "$head" in
@@ -144,7 +156,8 @@ bisect_start() {
# Write new start state.
#
echo "$start_head" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START" &&
- git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES" &&
+ git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES"
+ echo "$BISECT_MODE" > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE" &&
eval "$eval true" &&
echo "git bisect start$orig_args" >>"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG" || exit
#
@@ -291,7 +304,7 @@ bisect_next() {
bisect_next_check good
# Perform all bisection computation, display and checkout
- git bisect--helper --next-all
+ git bisect--helper --next-all ${BISECT_MODE}
res=$?
# Check if we should exit because bisection is finished
@@ -340,11 +353,15 @@ bisect_reset() {
*)
usage ;;
esac
- if git checkout "$branch" -- ; then
- bisect_clean_state
+ if test "$BISECT_MODE" = "--no-checkout"; then
+ git symbolic-ref HEAD $(git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name "${branch}")
else
- die "$(eval_gettext "Could not check out original HEAD '\$branch'.
+ if git checkout "$branch" --; then
+ bisect_clean_state
+ else
+ die "$(eval_gettext "Could not check out original HEAD '\$branch'.
Try 'git bisect reset <commit>'.")"
+ fi
fi
}
@@ -360,6 +377,7 @@ bisect_clean_state() {
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_LOG" &&
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES" &&
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_RUN" &&
+ rm -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE" &&
# Cleanup head-name if it got left by an old version of git-bisect
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/head-name" &&
--
1.7.6.353.gb3ae7e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-02 23:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-02 23:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-03 18:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-03 5:17 ` Christian Couder
1 sibling, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-08-02 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Seymour; +Cc: git, chriscool, j6t, jnareb
Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:
> + BISECT_MODE=
> while [ $# -gt 0 ]; do
> arg="$1"
> case "$arg" in
> @@ -76,6 +79,11 @@ bisect_start() {
> shift
> break
> ;;
> + --no-checkout)
> + BISECT_MODE=--no-checkout;
> + shift ;;
> + --*)
> + die "$(eval_gettext "unrecognised option: '\$arg'")" ;;
> *)
> rev=$(git rev-parse -q --verify "$arg^{commit}") || {
> test $has_double_dash -eq 1 &&
> @@ -107,7 +115,11 @@ bisect_start() {
> then
> # Reset to the rev from where we started.
> start_head=$(cat "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START")
> - git checkout "$start_head" -- || exit
> + if test "$BISECT_MODE" = "--no-checkout"; then
> + git update-ref --no-deref HEAD "$start_head"
> + else
> + git checkout "$start_head" --
> + fi
Just a minor worry but I would not be surprised if somebody's "test"
implementation barfs upon:
test "--no-checkout" = "--no-checkout"
mistaking the string with a dash at the beginning as an option unknown to
it. That is why we often have "z$variable" in our comparison, like so:
if test "z$BISECT_MODE" = "z--no-checkout"
then
git update-ref --no-deref BISECT_HEAD "$start_head"
else
git checkout "$start_head" --
fi
> - git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES" &&
> + git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES"
> + echo "$BISECT_MODE" > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE" &&
&&?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-02 23:01 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2011-08-02 23:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-03 5:28 ` Christian Couder
2011-08-03 13:16 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-03 18:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
1 sibling, 2 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-08-02 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Seymour; +Cc: git, chriscool, j6t, jnareb
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:
> ...
>> + if test "$BISECT_MODE" = "--no-checkout"; then
>> + git update-ref --no-deref HEAD "$start_head"
>> + else
>> + git checkout "$start_head" --
>> + fi
>
> Just a minor worry but I would not be surprised if somebody's "test"
> implementation barfs upon:
>
> test "--no-checkout" = "--no-checkout"
>
> mistaking the string with a dash at the beginning as an option unknown to
> it. That is why we often have "z$variable" in our comparison, like so:
>
> if test "z$BISECT_MODE" = "z--no-checkout"
> then
> git update-ref --no-deref BISECT_HEAD "$start_head"
> else
> git checkout "$start_head" --
> fi
>
>> - git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES" &&
>> + git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES"
>> + echo "$BISECT_MODE" > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE" &&
>
> &&?
Having said that, other than these minor nits, I think this round is
almost ready. I didn't check how it behaves upon "bisect reset",
though. It shouldn't touch the index, HEAD nor the working tree (it
probably is just the matter of "update-ref -d BISECT_HEAD" and nothing
else, but I haven't thought things through thoroughly).
Further polishing we may want to do while it is still in pu/next I can
think of off the top of my head are:
- In this mode, I can bisect the history even inside a bare repository,
as the whole point of --no-checkout is that the mode does not require a
working tree. I however suspect "git bisect" requires working tree. Is
this something we want to fix?
- Further, perhaps should we default to this mode inside a bare
repository?
Christian, do you think of anything else? Also do you see flaws in our
reasoning that updating only BISECT_HEAD and doing nothing else is a good
way to do this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-02 23:16 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2011-08-03 5:28 ` Christian Couder
2011-08-03 13:16 ` Jon Seymour
1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Christian Couder @ 2011-08-03 5:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Jon Seymour, git, j6t, jnareb
On Wednesday 03 August 2011 01:16:54 Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> Having said that, other than these minor nits, I think this round is
> almost ready. I didn't check how it behaves upon "bisect reset",
> though. It shouldn't touch the index, HEAD nor the working tree (it
> probably is just the matter of "update-ref -d BISECT_HEAD" and nothing
> else, but I haven't thought things through thoroughly).
>
> Further polishing we may want to do while it is still in pu/next I can
> think of off the top of my head are:
>
> - In this mode, I can bisect the history even inside a bare repository,
> as the whole point of --no-checkout is that the mode does not require a
> working tree. I however suspect "git bisect" requires working tree. Is
> this something we want to fix?
>
> - Further, perhaps should we default to this mode inside a bare
> repository?
I agree that it would be nice if it worked in a bare repo. I did not look at
that yet.
> Christian, do you think of anything else?
No, I agree that it looks almost ready.
The few improvements I would like are:
- squashing the last patch into the previous ones,
- using a bisect_mode() function when needed.
> Also do you see flaws in our
> reasoning that updating only BISECT_HEAD and doing nothing else is a good
> way to do this?
No, I agree that --no-checkout is a good idea and that using only BISECT_HEAD
is good way to do this.
Thanks,
Christian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-02 23:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-03 5:28 ` Christian Couder
@ 2011-08-03 13:16 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-03 15:24 ` Jon Seymour
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-03 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git, chriscool, j6t, jnareb
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:
>> ...
>>> + if test "$BISECT_MODE" = "--no-checkout"; then
>>> + git update-ref --no-deref HEAD "$start_head"
>>> + else
>>> + git checkout "$start_head" --
>>> + fi
>>
>> Just a minor worry but I would not be surprised if somebody's "test"
>> implementation barfs upon:
>>
>> test "--no-checkout" = "--no-checkout"
>>
>> mistaking the string with a dash at the beginning as an option unknown to
>> it. That is why we often have "z$variable" in our comparison, like so:
>>
>> if test "z$BISECT_MODE" = "z--no-checkout"
>> then
>> git update-ref --no-deref BISECT_HEAD "$start_head"
>> else
>> git checkout "$start_head" --
>> fi
>>
>>> - git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES" &&
>>> + git rev-parse --sq-quote "$@" >"$GIT_DIR/BISECT_NAMES"
>>> + echo "$BISECT_MODE" > "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE" &&
>>
>> &&?
>
> Having said that, other than these minor nits, I think this round is
> almost ready. I didn't check how it behaves upon "bisect reset",
> though. It shouldn't touch the index, HEAD nor the working tree (it
> probably is just the matter of "update-ref -d BISECT_HEAD" and nothing
> else, but I haven't thought things through thoroughly).
That seems reasonable. In fact, none of these series properly cleaned
up the reset state properly, so I'll fix that and a test for it.
>
> Further polishing we may want to do while it is still in pu/next I can
> think of off the top of my head are:
>
> - In this mode, I can bisect the history even inside a bare repository,
> as the whole point of --no-checkout is that the mode does not require a
> working tree. I however suspect "git bisect" requires working tree. Is
> this something we want to fix?
>
I agree, that would be useful. Haven't tried it yet but I'll see what
happens.I may issue changes for this as separate commit that can be
squashed later, if required, once it has been reviewed.
BTW: I'll squash v14 8/8 into the other commits, per Christian's suggestion.
> - Further, perhaps should we default to this mode inside a bare
> repository?
Seems reasonable.
jon.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-03 13:16 ` Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-03 15:24 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-03 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-03 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git, chriscool, j6t, jnareb
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>>
>>> Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Further polishing we may want to do while it is still in pu/next I can
>> think of off the top of my head are:
>>
>> - In this mode, I can bisect the history even inside a bare repository,
>> as the whole point of --no-checkout is that the mode does not require a
>> working tree. I however suspect "git bisect" requires working tree. Is
>> this something we want to fix?
>>
>
> I agree, that would be useful. Haven't tried it yet but I'll see what
> happens.I may issue changes for this as separate commit that can be
> squashed later, if required, once it has been reviewed.
>
I had a quick go at doing this, but haven't been able to test it
fully. At a minimum it will require that we relax the barriers in
git-bisect.sh and git.c that prevent git-bisect
and bisect--helper running without a working tree. Other paths in
these modules will need to be checked to see that they don't have an
implicit assumption that a working tree is available.
I won't have time to tackle this properly until the weekend.
jon.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-03 15:24 ` Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-03 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-08-03 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Seymour; +Cc: git, chriscool, j6t, jnareb
Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com> writes:
> I had a quick go at doing this, but haven't been able to test it
> fully. At a minimum it will require that we relax the barriers in
> git-bisect.sh and git.c that prevent git-bisect
> and bisect--helper running without a working tree. Other paths in
> these modules will need to be checked to see that they don't have an
> implicit assumption that a working tree is available.
>
> I won't have time to tackle this properly until the weekend.
That is Ok and thanks for looking. Making this available to bare
repository is a totally separate follow-on topic that can and should be
done as a separate series that depends on the current topic anyway, so
let's focus on the current topic at hand first.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-02 23:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-02 23:16 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2011-08-03 18:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-03 21:40 ` Jon Seymour
1 sibling, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Nieder @ 2011-08-03 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Jon Seymour, git, chriscool, j6t, jnareb
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Just a minor worry but I would not be surprised if somebody's "test"
> implementation barfs upon:
>
> test "--no-checkout" = "--no-checkout"
>
> mistaking the string with a dash at the beginning as an option unknown to
> it. That is why we often have "z$variable" in our comparison, like so:
>
> if test "z$BISECT_MODE" = "z--no-checkout"
Hmm.
$ git grep -e 'test "\$' | wc -l
712
$ git grep -e 'test ".\$' | wc -l
183
We are very inconsistent about such usage, generally, and of course
POSIX is very clear about the 'z' not being needed in a three-argument
"test" used for string comparison. Is there any platform that is
usable for git (e.g., that implements "$( ... )") and has that
problem?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-03 18:57 ` Jonathan Nieder
@ 2011-08-03 21:40 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-03 21:45 ` Jonathan Nieder
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-03 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Nieder; +Cc: Junio C Hamano, git, chriscool, j6t, jnareb
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Just a minor worry but I would not be surprised if somebody's "test"
>> implementation barfs upon:
>>
>> test "--no-checkout" = "--no-checkout"
>>
>> mistaking the string with a dash at the beginning as an option unknown to
>> it. That is why we often have "z$variable" in our comparison, like so:
>>
>> if test "z$BISECT_MODE" = "z--no-checkout"
>
> Hmm.
>
> $ git grep -e 'test "\$' | wc -l
> 712
> $ git grep -e 'test ".\$' | wc -l
> 183
>
> We are very inconsistent about such usage, generally, and of course
> POSIX is very clear about the 'z' not being needed in a three-argument
> "test" used for string comparison. Is there any platform that is
> usable for git (e.g., that implements "$( ... )") and has that
> problem?
>
Thanks. Applied.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-03 21:40 ` Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-03 21:45 ` Jonathan Nieder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Nieder @ 2011-08-03 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Seymour; +Cc: Junio C Hamano, git, chriscool, j6t, jnareb
Jon Seymour wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We are very inconsistent about such usage, generally, and of course
>> POSIX is very clear about the 'z' not being needed in a three-argument
>> "test" used for string comparison. Is there any platform that is
>> usable for git (e.g., that implements "$( ... )") and has that
>> problem?
>
> Thanks. Applied.
Hm --- I was just asking a question, not meant to be rhetorical. I
guess the question was applied, or that you inferred some patch from
it. :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain.
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 23:01 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2011-08-03 5:17 ` Christian Couder
1 sibling, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Christian Couder @ 2011-08-03 5:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Seymour; +Cc: git, gitster, j6t, jnareb
On Wednesday 03 August 2011 00:15:59 Jon Seymour wrote:
> @@ -291,7 +304,7 @@ bisect_next() {
> bisect_next_check good
>
> # Perform all bisection computation, display and checkout
> - git bisect--helper --next-all
> + git bisect--helper --next-all ${BISECT_MODE}
Style, please use $BISECT_MODE instead of ${BISECT_MODE}
Thanks,
Christian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v14 6/8] bisect: add tests for the --no-checkout option.
2011-08-02 22:15 [PATCH v14 0/8] bisect: Add support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-02 22:15 ` [PATCH v14 5/8] bisect: introduce --no-checkout support into porcelain Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-02 22:16 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:16 ` [PATCH v14 7/8] bisect: add documentation for " Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:16 ` [PATCH v14 8/8] bisect: change bisect function to update BISECT_HEAD, rather than HEAD Jon Seymour
7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-02 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: chriscool, gitster, j6t, jnareb, Jon Seymour
These tests verify that git-bisect --no-checkout can successfully
bisect commit histories that reference damaged trees.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
---
t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index 9ae2de8..a1e0ddc 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -616,6 +616,14 @@ cat > expected.missing-tree.default <<EOF
fatal: unable to read tree 39f7e61a724187ab767d2e08442d9b6b9dab587d
EOF
+check_same()
+{
+ echo "Checking $1 is the same as $2" &&
+ git rev-parse "$1" > expected.same &&
+ git rev-parse "$2" > expected.actual &&
+ test_cmp expected.same expected.actual
+}
+
test_expect_success 'bisect fails if tree is broken on start commit' '
git bisect reset &&
test_must_fail git bisect start BROKEN_HASH7 BROKEN_HASH4 2>error.txt &&
@@ -630,4 +638,66 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect fails if tree is broken on trial commit' '
test_cmp expected.missing-tree.default error.txt
'
+test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - start commit bad' '
+ git bisect reset &&
+ git bisect start BROKEN_HASH7 BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
+ git bisect reset
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - trial commit bad' '
+ git bisect reset &&
+ git bisect start broken BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
+ git bisect reset
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - target before breakage' '
+ git bisect reset &&
+ git bisect start broken BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
+ git bisect bad HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH5 HEAD &&
+ git bisect bad HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH5 bisect/bad &&
+ git bisect reset
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - target in breakage' '
+ git bisect reset &&
+ git bisect start broken BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
+ git bisect bad HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH5 HEAD &&
+ git bisect good HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 bisect/bad &&
+ git bisect reset
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - target after breakage' '
+ git bisect reset &&
+ git bisect start broken BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
+ git bisect good HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH8 HEAD &&
+ git bisect good HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH9 bisect/bad &&
+ git bisect reset
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'bisect: demonstrate identification of damage boundary' "
+ git bisect reset &&
+ git checkout broken &&
+ git bisect start broken master --no-checkout &&
+ git bisect run eval '
+rc=1;
+if git rev-list --objects HEAD >tmp.$$; then
+ git pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null < tmp.$$ && rc=0;
+fi;
+rm tmp.$$;
+test \$rc -eq 0;' &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 bisect/bad &&
+ git bisect reset
+"
+
test_done
--
1.7.6.353.gb3ae7e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v14 7/8] bisect: add documentation for --no-checkout option.
2011-08-02 22:15 [PATCH v14 0/8] bisect: Add support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-02 22:16 ` [PATCH v14 6/8] bisect: add tests for the --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-02 22:16 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-02 22:16 ` [PATCH v14 8/8] bisect: change bisect function to update BISECT_HEAD, rather than HEAD Jon Seymour
7 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-02 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: chriscool, gitster, j6t, jnareb, Jon Seymour
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
index ab60a18..2014894 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ The command takes various subcommands, and different options depending
on the subcommand:
git bisect help
- git bisect start [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...]
+ git bisect start [--no-checkout] [<bad> [<good>...]] [--] [<paths>...]
git bisect bad [<rev>]
git bisect good [<rev>...]
git bisect skip [(<rev>|<range>)...]
@@ -263,6 +263,17 @@ rewind the tree to the pristine state. Finally the script should exit
with the status of the real test to let the "git bisect run" command loop
determine the eventual outcome of the bisect session.
+OPTIONS
+-------
+--no-checkout::
++
+This option is used to specify that 'git bisect' should not modify the working
+tree or index on each iteration of the bisection process but should
+update HEAD instead.
++
+This option is useful in circumstances in which checkout is either not
+possible (because of a damaged respository) or is otherwise not required.
+
EXAMPLES
--------
@@ -343,6 +354,25 @@ $ git bisect run sh -c "make || exit 125; ~/check_test_case.sh"
This shows that you can do without a run script if you write the test
on a single line.
+* Locate a good region of the object graph in a damaged repository
++
+------------
+$ git bisect start HEAD <known-good-commit> [ <boundary-commit> ... ] --no-checkout
+$ git bisect run eval '
+rc=1;
+if git rev-list --objects HEAD >tmp.$$; then
+ git pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null < tmp.$$ && rc=0;
+fi;
+rm tmp.$$;
+test $rc -eq 0;'
+
+------------
++
+In this case, when 'git bisect run' finishes, bisect/bad will refer to a commit that
+has at least one parent whose reachable graph is fully traversable in the sense
+required by 'git pack objects'.
+
+
SEE ALSO
--------
link:git-bisect-lk2009.html[Fighting regressions with git bisect],
--
1.7.6.353.gb3ae7e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v14 8/8] bisect: change bisect function to update BISECT_HEAD, rather than HEAD.
2011-08-02 22:15 [PATCH v14 0/8] bisect: Add support for --no-checkout option Jon Seymour
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-02 22:16 ` [PATCH v14 7/8] bisect: add documentation for " Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-02 22:16 ` Jon Seymour
2011-08-03 4:43 ` Christian Couder
7 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jon Seymour @ 2011-08-02 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git; +Cc: chriscool, gitster, j6t, jnareb, Jon Seymour
This function modifies git-bisect so that the --no-checkout option
uses BISECT_HEAD rather than HEAD to record the current bisection
head.
The intent is to reduce the confusion that uses of --no-checkout
may experience when using the --no-checkout option since the bisection
process will no longer introduce spurious differences between the
HEAD reference and the working tree and index.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 8 ++++----
bisect.c | 2 +-
builtin/bisect--helper.c | 2 +-
git-bisect.sh | 17 +++++++++++++----
t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
index 2014894..a9b217b 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
@@ -267,9 +267,9 @@ OPTIONS
-------
--no-checkout::
+
-This option is used to specify that 'git bisect' should not modify the working
-tree or index on each iteration of the bisection process but should
-update HEAD instead.
+This option is used to specify that 'git bisect' should not checkout the
+new working tree at each iteration of the bisection process but should
+instead update BISECT_HEAD.
+
This option is useful in circumstances in which checkout is either not
possible (because of a damaged respository) or is otherwise not required.
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ on a single line.
$ git bisect start HEAD <known-good-commit> [ <boundary-commit> ... ] --no-checkout
$ git bisect run eval '
rc=1;
-if git rev-list --objects HEAD >tmp.$$; then
+if git rev-list --objects BISECT_HEAD >tmp.$$; then
git pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null < tmp.$$ && rc=0;
fi;
rm tmp.$$;
diff --git a/bisect.c b/bisect.c
index 0427117..46874be 100644
--- a/bisect.c
+++ b/bisect.c
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ struct argv_array {
static const char *argv_checkout[] = {"checkout", "-q", NULL, "--", NULL};
static const char *argv_show_branch[] = {"show-branch", NULL, NULL};
-static const char *argv_update_ref[] = {"update-ref", "--no-deref", "HEAD", NULL, NULL};
+static const char *argv_update_ref[] = {"update-ref", "--no-deref", "BISECT_HEAD", NULL, NULL};
/* bits #0-15 in revision.h */
diff --git a/builtin/bisect--helper.c b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
index d96a193..8d325a5 100644
--- a/builtin/bisect--helper.c
+++ b/builtin/bisect--helper.c
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ int cmd_bisect__helper(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "next-all", &next_all,
"perform 'git bisect next'"),
OPT_BOOLEAN(0, "no-checkout", &no_checkout,
- "update HEAD instead of checking out the current commit"),
+ "update BISECT_HEAD instead of checking out the current commit"),
OPT_END()
};
diff --git a/git-bisect.sh b/git-bisect.sh
index 99a2637..9792a84 100755
--- a/git-bisect.sh
+++ b/git-bisect.sh
@@ -36,6 +36,15 @@ _x40="$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40$_x40"
BISECT_MODE=$(test -f "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE" && cat "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_MODE")
+bisect_head()
+{
+ if test "$BISECT_MODE" = "--no-checkout"; then
+ echo BISECT_HEAD;
+ else
+ echo HEAD
+ fi
+}
+
bisect_autostart() {
test -s "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START" || {
(
@@ -116,7 +125,7 @@ bisect_start() {
# Reset to the rev from where we started.
start_head=$(cat "$GIT_DIR/BISECT_START")
if test "$BISECT_MODE" = "--no-checkout"; then
- git update-ref --no-deref HEAD "$start_head"
+ git update-ref --no-deref $(bisect_head) "$start_head"
else
git checkout "$start_head" --
fi
@@ -219,8 +228,8 @@ bisect_state() {
0,*)
die "$(gettext "Please call 'bisect_state' with at least one argument.")" ;;
1,bad|1,good|1,skip)
- rev=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) ||
- die "$(gettext "Bad rev input: HEAD")"
+ rev=$(git rev-parse --verify $(bisect_head)) ||
+ die "$(gettext "Bad rev input: $(bisect_head)")"
bisect_write "$state" "$rev"
check_expected_revs "$rev" ;;
2,bad|*,good|*,skip)
@@ -354,7 +363,7 @@ bisect_reset() {
usage ;;
esac
if test "$BISECT_MODE" = "--no-checkout"; then
- git symbolic-ref HEAD $(git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name "${branch}")
+ git symbolic-ref $(bisect_head) $(git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name "${branch}")
else
if git checkout "$branch" --; then
bisect_clean_state
diff --git a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
index a1e0ddc..ef422a1 100755
--- a/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
+++ b/t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh
@@ -641,24 +641,24 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect fails if tree is broken on trial commit' '
test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - start commit bad' '
git bisect reset &&
git bisect start BROKEN_HASH7 BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
- check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 BISECT_HEAD &&
git bisect reset
'
test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - trial commit bad' '
git bisect reset &&
git bisect start broken BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
- check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 BISECT_HEAD &&
git bisect reset
'
test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - target before breakage' '
git bisect reset &&
git bisect start broken BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
- check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
- git bisect bad HEAD &&
- check_same BROKEN_HASH5 HEAD &&
- git bisect bad HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 BISECT_HEAD &&
+ git bisect bad BISECT_HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH5 BISECT_HEAD &&
+ git bisect bad BISECT_HEAD &&
check_same BROKEN_HASH5 bisect/bad &&
git bisect reset
'
@@ -666,10 +666,10 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - target before breakage' '
test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - target in breakage' '
git bisect reset &&
git bisect start broken BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
- check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
- git bisect bad HEAD &&
- check_same BROKEN_HASH5 HEAD &&
- git bisect good HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 BISECT_HEAD &&
+ git bisect bad BISECT_HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH5 BISECT_HEAD &&
+ git bisect good BISECT_HEAD &&
check_same BROKEN_HASH6 bisect/bad &&
git bisect reset
'
@@ -677,10 +677,10 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - target in breakage' '
test_expect_success 'bisect: --no-checkout - target after breakage' '
git bisect reset &&
git bisect start broken BROKEN_HASH4 --no-checkout &&
- check_same BROKEN_HASH6 HEAD &&
- git bisect good HEAD &&
- check_same BROKEN_HASH8 HEAD &&
- git bisect good HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH6 BISECT_HEAD &&
+ git bisect good BISECT_HEAD &&
+ check_same BROKEN_HASH8 BISECT_HEAD &&
+ git bisect good BISECT_HEAD &&
check_same BROKEN_HASH9 bisect/bad &&
git bisect reset
'
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ test_expect_success 'bisect: demonstrate identification of damage boundary' "
git bisect start broken master --no-checkout &&
git bisect run eval '
rc=1;
-if git rev-list --objects HEAD >tmp.$$; then
+if git rev-list --objects BISECT_HEAD >tmp.$$; then
git pack-objects --stdout >/dev/null < tmp.$$ && rc=0;
fi;
rm tmp.$$;
--
1.7.6.353.gb3ae7e
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v14 8/8] bisect: change bisect function to update BISECT_HEAD, rather than HEAD.
2011-08-02 22:16 ` [PATCH v14 8/8] bisect: change bisect function to update BISECT_HEAD, rather than HEAD Jon Seymour
@ 2011-08-03 4:43 ` Christian Couder
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Christian Couder @ 2011-08-03 4:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Seymour; +Cc: git, gitster, j6t, jnareb
I think a better title for this patch would be something like:
bisect: update BISECT_HEAD, rather than HEAD, when using --no-checkout
But anyway in my opinion the patch series would be better if this patch was
squashed into the previous patches.
On Wednesday 03 August 2011 00:16:02 Jon Seymour wrote:
> This function modifies git-bisect so that the --no-checkout option
> uses BISECT_HEAD rather than HEAD to record the current bisection
> head.
s/This function/This patch/
> The intent is to reduce the confusion that uses of --no-checkout
s/uses/users/
> may experience when using the --no-checkout option since the bisection
> process will no longer introduce spurious differences between the
> HEAD reference and the working tree and index.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/git-bisect.txt | 8 ++++----
> bisect.c | 2 +-
> builtin/bisect--helper.c | 2 +-
> git-bisect.sh | 17 +++++++++++++----
> t/t6030-bisect-porcelain.sh | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> 5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> index 2014894..a9b217b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-bisect.txt
> @@ -267,9 +267,9 @@ OPTIONS
> -------
> --no-checkout::
> +
> -This option is used to specify that 'git bisect' should not modify the
> working -tree or index on each iteration of the bisection process but
> should -update HEAD instead.
> +This option is used to specify that 'git bisect' should not checkout the
> +new working tree at each iteration of the bisection process but should
> +instead update BISECT_HEAD.
I would say something like:
Do not checkout the new working tree at each iteration of the bisection
process. Instead just update a special reference named 'BISECT_HEAD' to make
it point to the commit that should be tested.
> +
> This option is useful in circumstances in which checkout is either not
> possible (because of a damaged respository) or is otherwise not required.
Thanks,
Christian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread