From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Drew Northup <drew.northup@maine.edu>,
Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Strange O(N^3) behavior in "git filter-branch"
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 13:37:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110803193740.GA23848@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E394E33.4060107@alum.mit.edu>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 03:33:39PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 07/15/2011 11:19 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> > On 07/14/2011 11:24 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> >> On 07/14/2011 09:16 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> >>> I have noticed that "git filter-branch" gets pathologically slow when it
> >>> operates on a repository that has many references in a complicated
> >>> directory hierarchy. The time seems to go like O(N^3), where N is the
> >>> number of references being rewritten.
> > [...]
> > A many possible improvements come to mind, in increasing order of
> > intrusiveness and generality:
> > [...]
> > 5. Organize the loose refs cache in memory as a tree, and only populate
> > the parts of it that are accessed. This should also speed up iteration
> > through a subtree by avoiding a linear search through all loose references.
>
> FYI: I am working on (5), namely storing a linked list of loose refs for
> each directory and only populating those directories that are accessed.
> The directories themselves will be held in a tree/trie (AFAICT the
> distinction is primarily whether each node holds its whole key or only
> the part of the key relative to its parent, which is an implementation
> detail). As a bonus, the caches for submodules will be handled
> correctly (they are currently never used).
>
> It might be another week or so before I have patches ready.
Great. That is exactly the solution I was going to pursue, as well, but
I didn't actually start on it yet. I look forward to seeing your
patches.
-Peff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-03 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-14 7:16 Strange O(N^3) behavior in "git filter-branch" Michael Haggerty
2011-07-14 9:24 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-07-15 9:19 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-07-15 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-07-15 21:20 ` Jeff King
2011-07-16 5:26 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-07-17 13:24 ` Drew Northup
2011-07-18 8:59 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-07-18 16:01 ` Drew Northup
2011-08-03 13:33 ` Michael Haggerty
2011-08-03 19:37 ` Jeff King [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110803193740.GA23848@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=drew.northup@maine.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).