From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Suppressing auto-cc for specific addresses Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:44:48 -0600 Message-ID: <20110808204448.GF18294@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <4E3EF38A.9010307@gmail.com> <20110807234634.GA3236@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Aguilar , Greg KH , "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Daniel Mack X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 08 22:45:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqWh3-0007YG-Ji for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 22:45:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753878Ab1HHUo4 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:44:56 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:34275 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753418Ab1HHUo4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2011 16:44:56 -0400 Received: (qmail 30013 invoked by uid 107); 8 Aug 2011 20:45:31 -0000 Received: from S010690840de80b38.ss.shawcable.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (70.64.172.81) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 16:45:31 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:44:48 -0600 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 12:58:55PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:56 PM, David Aguilar wro= te: > > git send-email has a=C2=A0--[no-]signed-off-by-cc option and config= uration > > variable.=C2=A0-- >=20 > I know, but that's not the point. It about having a certain address > metioned in a ^Cc: line inside the patch and suppress sending off > emails to that specific address. And --suppress-cc currently only > allows categories to be set, not addresses. I'm kind of confused why you would mark an address as "cc", but not cc it. Wouldn't it make sense to call the header something else? -Peff