From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] revert: Make the argument parser responsible for setup_revisions
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 07:52:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110814125223.GE18466@elie.gateway.2wire.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313310789-10216-6-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com>
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> Currently, prepare_revs calls setup_revisions with the (argc, argv) in
> the opts structure filled in by parse_args. As a result, prepare_revs
> has to take up the responsibility of erroring out and printing usage
> information when (argc, argv) is malformed. Since parse_args is doing
> this for other kinds of parse errors anyway, give it the task of
> calling setup_revisions as well.
I'm having trouble understanding the above. Are you saying that we
want to concentrate all usage() calls in a single function for some
reason and prepare_revs() goes against this? Why would I (the reader)
care about that?
Presumably a simpler explanation is that it makes my life easier in
two ways:
1. If I want to understand what commandline arguments are accepted
by cherry-pick/revert, after this patch there is just one function
to look at.
2. If I want to ask the replay machinery to do something different,
as a caller I can set my options in a "struct rev_info" instead
of forging commandline arguments with the same effect.
> Based-on-patch-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Since I wrote the patch modulo the commit message and small
improvements, shouldn't I be blamed as the author? (git log
--grep="[Oo]riginal patch" and git log --grep=jc: give some examples.)
You can have my sign-off if you'd like.
[...]
> + if (opts->subcommand == REPLAY_NONE) {
> + opts->revs = xmalloc(sizeof(*opts->revs));
My fault: this never gets freed. As long as this is private to the
cherry-pick/revert builtin, it's a one-time tiny leak cleaned up by
_exit --- no harm done, but probably worth a comment.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-14 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-14 8:33 [PATCH v2 0/7] Generalized sequencer foundations Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 8:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] revert: Free memory after get_message call Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 16:15 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 8:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] revert: Fix buffer overflow in insn sheet parser Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 11:58 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 14:07 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 8:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] revert: Make commit descriptions in insn sheet optional Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 16:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 16:21 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 8:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] revert: Allow mixed pick and revert instructions Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 12:12 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 14:06 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 14:28 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 8:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] revert: Make the argument parser responsible for setup_revisions Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 12:52 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2011-08-14 13:43 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 8:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] sequencer: Expose API to cherry-picking machinery Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 13:13 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 13:57 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 15:22 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-16 17:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-16 18:16 ` [PATCH v2] revert: plug memory leak in "cherry-pick root commit" codepath Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-16 18:27 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-16 18:31 ` Jeff King
2011-08-16 18:56 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 8:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] sequencer: Remove sequencer state after final commit Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 16:04 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 16:37 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-14 16:48 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 21:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-14 21:32 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-14 22:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-15 18:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-17 20:23 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-18 18:51 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-18 19:18 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-18 19:50 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-18 20:05 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-18 20:06 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2011-08-18 20:12 ` Jonathan Nieder
2011-08-18 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-18 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-19 9:08 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110814125223.GE18466@elie.gateway.2wire.net \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).