From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] check-ref-format --print: Normalize refnames that start with slashes Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:01:18 -0400 Message-ID: <20110829190118.GE756@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1314418364-2532-1-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <1314418364-2532-2-git-send-email-mhagger@alum.mit.edu> <4E58710B.60507@alum.mit.edu> <7vty92adv0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110829185011.GC756@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Michael Haggerty , git@vger.kernel.org, cmn@elego.de To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 29 21:01:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qy75T-0001cX-Hw for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:01:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754832Ab1H2TBY (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:01:24 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:47914 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754828Ab1H2TBU (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:01:20 -0400 Received: (qmail 19381 invoked by uid 107); 29 Aug 2011 19:02:05 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:02:05 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:01:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110829185011.GC756@sigill.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:50:12PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > 3. Having better tool support for comparing two sets of commits. The > ideal interface (to me) for this workflow would be something like: BTW, this discussion is obviously about comparing what was applied upstream with what was submitted, but I think such a tool could have other purposes, too. It should be able to provide a much nicer interdiff between two versions of the same series (e.g., for reviewers looking at a re-roll). You could even use it as maintainer to apply a re-roll, giving you a chance to review the differences as you apply. -Peff