From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>,
git@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael J Gruber" <git@drmicha.warpmail.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*).
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:22:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110901162222.GC15018@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vbov4xnfc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:00:39AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> > To match the parsing of commit objects, I would prefer to see
> >> > "subject" to mean "the first paragraph" (usually the first line
> >> > alone but that is purely from convention), but that probably is a
> >> > separate topic.
> >>
> >> Good idea. I suspect pretty.c:format_subject can be reused here.
> >
> > Should I fix regular 'subject' and 'body' as well, or just
> > the 'contents:' variants?
>
> I thought you made them synonyms...
No, %(body) retains its historical usage as body+signature. If you think
it's OK to change that.
We could either leave %(subject) with its historical behavior, or fix it
to handle multi-line subjects. Although it's technically a regression to
change it, I tend to think it is simply a bug, as it doesn't match what
the rest of git (like "git log --format=%s") does.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 19:10 More formatting with 'git tag -l' Michał Górny
2011-08-29 19:36 ` Jeff King
2011-08-29 21:20 ` Michał Górny
2011-08-29 21:37 ` Jeff King
2011-08-29 21:50 ` Michał Górny
2011-08-30 8:57 ` [PATCH] git-for-each-ref: move GPG sigs off %(body) to %(signature) Michał Górny
2011-08-30 9:43 ` Michael J Gruber
2011-08-30 15:58 ` Michał Górny
2011-08-30 16:27 ` Jeff King
2011-08-31 9:11 ` [PATCH] for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*) Michał Górny
2011-08-31 16:42 ` Jeff King
2011-08-31 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] t7004: factor out gpg setup Jeff King
2011-08-31 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] t6300: test new content:* for-each-ref placeholders Jeff King
2011-08-31 22:54 ` [PATCH] for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*) Junio C Hamano
2011-08-31 23:22 ` Jeff King
2011-09-01 7:34 ` Michał Górny
2011-09-01 16:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-09-01 16:22 ` Jeff King [this message]
2011-09-01 16:48 ` Michał Górny
2011-09-01 16:50 ` Michał Górny
2011-09-02 16:39 ` Jeff King
2011-09-02 17:39 ` Michał Górny
2011-09-02 17:53 ` Jeff King
2011-09-07 17:40 ` Jeff King
2011-09-15 8:18 ` Michał Górny
2011-09-07 17:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] t7004: factor out gpg setup Jeff King
2011-09-07 17:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] t6300: add more body-parsing tests Jeff King
2011-09-07 17:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] for-each-ref: refactor subject and body placeholder parsing Jeff King
2011-09-07 17:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] for-each-ref: handle multiline subjects like --pretty Jeff King
2011-09-07 17:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] for-each-ref: add split message parts to %(contents:*) Jeff King
2011-09-01 17:16 ` [PATCH] " Junio C Hamano
2011-09-01 18:19 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110901162222.GC15018@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@drmicha.warpmail.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mgorny@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).