From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "John S. Urban\"" <urbanjost@comcast.net>,
Tor Arntsen <tor@spacetec.no>, knittl <knittl89@googlemail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: "on for all" configuration of notes.rewriteRef
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 17:23:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110907212310.GH13364@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f415402994735a60664e1f9f85be490a68b25ed3.1315167848.git.trast@student.ethz.ch>
On Sun, Sep 04, 2011 at 10:27:04PM +0200, Thomas Rast wrote:
> Users had problems finding a working setting for notes.rewriteRef.
> Document how to enable rewriting for all notes.
Hmm. Is this a safe thing to recommend?
I think the idea of storing something like generation numbers in
git-notes is dead at this point, but it would be quite disastrous to
have generation numbers copied to rebased commits. Ditto for something
like a patch-id cache. Should these sorts of immutable cache notes, if
and when they do come about, go into a separate hierarchy?
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-07 21:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-04 1:32 Lost association between TAGS and COMMITs when rebased a git(1) repository John S. Urban
2011-09-04 10:02 ` PJ Weisberg
2011-09-04 13:40 ` Michael Witten
2011-09-04 14:03 ` Michael Witten
[not found] ` <CA+sFfMcMgPDyCi6SCS=Sc4XFrug_Ee7vbmBBkmkwfwwpXg8yCg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-04 14:38 ` Michael Witten
2011-09-04 17:20 ` Philip Oakley
2011-09-04 18:15 ` knittl
2011-09-04 14:30 ` knittl
2011-09-04 14:43 ` Michael Witten
2011-09-04 15:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-09-04 18:16 ` Tor Arntsen
2011-09-04 18:43 ` Thomas Rast
2011-09-04 19:11 ` Tor Arntsen
2011-09-04 20:18 ` John S. Urban
2011-09-04 20:28 ` [PATCH] Documentation: "on for all" configuration of notes.rewriteRef Thomas Rast
2011-09-04 20:43 ` Tor Arntsen
2011-09-07 21:23 ` Jeff King [this message]
2011-09-07 21:29 ` Thomas Rast
2011-09-07 21:35 ` Jeff King
[not found] ` <CACx-yZ1Ce3x=ZSdm5iY3JqYjVGVs5uPnb12-tMJP7zWsGuMK_Q@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-04 16:40 ` Lost association between TAGS and COMMITs when rebased a git(1) repository John S. Urban
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110907212310.GH13364@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=knittl89@googlemail.com \
--cc=tor@spacetec.no \
--cc=trast@student.ethz.ch \
--cc=urbanjost@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).