git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] push -s: skeleton
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:22:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110909152248.GA28480@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJo=hJsQvRN3Z0xJg9q37Km1g_1qUdJKNQ6n8=a9mv3YjugyVw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 03:07:25PM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

> A notes tree per ref is ugly when you have a lot of branches. Its a
> problem when you merge commits from say "maint" over to "master" 2
> days after they were initially pushed. Ideally the notes tree for
> master also includes what you brought over.

I agree you can end up with a lot of refs if you have a lot of branches,
and that may get a bit unwieldy.  I don't see how the merge thing is a
problem, though. If you do the merge at a client, then those commits
will hit master by push, and you'll get entries in the cert tree for
master. If you do the merge locally, then there's not going to be a
signature on those commits hitting the master ref, no matter what the
storage scheme.

> However, maybe it is reasonable for a protocol extension to support
> "auto-notes-merge" on a refs/notes/ ref if the client asks for it in
> the send-pack/receive-pack command stream? Clients could push notes
> and have the server automatically merge the client's pushed commit
> into the notes tree, either by fast-forward or by performing an
> automatic notes merge, with concat being applied to non-identical
> notes on the same SHA-1. This would allow the client to prepare his
> local certificate, and push that notes tree, while still working
> around the race on the server side.
> 
> If the server doesn't support the protocol extension, the client can
> still push his signed notes, he just may run into a race with another
> concurrent user pushing into the same repository. Which then means
> that an upgrade of the server is really only important/necessary if
> you have "central repository" model that a lot of users push into. If
> you use the traditional workflow that GitHub encourages of per-user
> repositories, you would never have a race on the server, and wouldn't
> need the upgraded server binary with "auto-notes-merge".

I like this approach, as the protocol extension provides the minimal
building block that can be used to implement this, or any other
notes-related scheme.

-Peff

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-09 15:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-07 20:56 [PATCH 1/2] send-pack: typofix error message Junio C Hamano
2011-09-07 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] push -s: skeleton Junio C Hamano
2011-09-07 21:18   ` Shawn Pearce
2011-09-07 22:21     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-09-07 23:23       ` Shawn Pearce
2011-09-08 16:24         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-09-07 22:21   ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-09-07 22:40     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-09-07 23:55   ` Robin H. Johnson
2011-09-08 20:03     ` Jeff King
2011-09-09  1:30       ` Robin H. Johnson
2011-09-09 16:03         ` Joey Hess
2011-09-09 16:14           ` Drew Northup
2011-09-09 19:12           ` Jeff King
2011-09-08  4:37   ` [PATCH 3/2] Split GPG interface into its own helper library Junio C Hamano
2011-09-08  4:38   ` [PATCH 4/2] push -s: send signed push certificate Junio C Hamano
2011-09-08  5:38     ` [PATCH 5/2] push -s: receiving end Junio C Hamano
2011-09-08  9:31       ` Johan Herland
2011-09-08 16:43         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-09-08 19:35   ` [PATCH 2/2] push -s: skeleton Jeff King
2011-09-08 20:48     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-09-08 21:02       ` Jeff King
2011-09-08 22:19         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-09-09 15:34           ` Jeff King
2011-09-09 17:32             ` Junio C Hamano
     [not found]         ` <CAJo=hJsQvRN3Z0xJg9q37Km1g_1qUdJKNQ6n8=a9mv3YjugyVw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-09 15:22           ` Jeff King [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110909152248.GA28480@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).