From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/5] branch: introduce --list option Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:30:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20110909193033.GA31184@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <0785cac235c3b45537cf161c86dde8e798c4ff3e.1314367414.git.git@drmicha.warpmail.net> <7vfwkodq5s.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4E5A5290.4050005@drmicha.warpmail.net> <20110907195611.GD13364@sigill.intra.peff.net> <4E6889DF.7030404@drmicha.warpmail.net> <7vr53qwxtz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vmxeewx7f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4E69B832.9030503@drmicha.warpmail.net> <7vlitxvh45.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4E6A691C.2060803@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 09 21:30:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R26mf-0002d8-Cj for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 21:30:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759917Ab1IITah (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:30:37 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:50524 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759852Ab1IITag (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:30:36 -0400 Received: (qmail 1222 invoked by uid 107); 9 Sep 2011 19:31:26 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:31:26 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 09 Sep 2011 15:30:34 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E6A691C.2060803@drmicha.warpmail.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:29:32PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > I recall Peff had some comments on your new tests last night, by the way. > > Yes, we have tests (now) for "-v -d", "-v -m", "-v branch*" and > combinations with --list. Testing "-v foo" for creation would be good > (and belong into t3200). Is there anything to amend? I think my comment was just to add the "-v foo" test. -Peff