From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: vcs-svn and firends Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:45:39 -0500 Message-ID: <20110915174539.GB19450@elie> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Michael Barr , git@vger.kernel.org To: Dmitry Ivankov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 15 19:45:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4G0S-0003ya-O1 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:45:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934267Ab1IORpo (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:45:44 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:65238 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934241Ab1IORpn (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:45:43 -0400 Received: by iaqq3 with SMTP id q3so1385044iaq.19 for ; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:45:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=qJFanubeBRHrZRr04Tdf6yA1+oS1lBAD1VHeuRUW+gQ=; b=IrPuUQ0ABtAOy83XY1lYI5HHf7tJve2AouupKsO+ACDyVIg9r5qauYPK8NaSMpALX0 ewVOOSffwbr0FoBrSyEs8aYNEVhRoVNS+PhV0JuXevvpWjk+X5RKOjJJse6zGeINYh0i ca+Og2MVokydMqjtO4NI4KYmR3q6JMQScoKto= Received: by 10.231.5.67 with SMTP id 3mr2229618ibu.98.1316108743081; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elie (99-120-124-35.lightspeed.cicril.sbcglobal.net. [99.120.124.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o5sm5603106ibu.12.2011.09.15.10.45.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21+46 (b01d63af6fea) (2011-07-01) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Dmitry Ivankov wrote: > A very quick view suggests that they could be reorganized, if it's okay. > For example: > - squash optifying REPORT_FILENO with it's addition. > - drop changes to repo_tree.c that were later erased > ...I bet there are more > > Does it make sense or we should better not rewrite the history? All else being equal, it is better not to rewrite history, especially when there are multiple series building on a commit (as is the case for most commits in the git://repo.or.cz/git/jrn.git svn-fe branch, just like Junio's "master" branch). Cheers, Jonathan