From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Problems with format-patch UTF-8 and a missing second empty line Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:33:36 -0400 Message-ID: <20110915203336.GA17566@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20110915151734.GA18305@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110915224456.14410ed8@zappedws> <20110915185033.GA17016@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110916000515.1dfc5665@zappedws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Ingo Ruhnke , git@vger.kernel.org To: Alexey Shumkin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 15 22:33:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R4Icx-00065z-Fj for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 22:33:43 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934882Ab1IOUdj (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:33:39 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:42862 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934787Ab1IOUdi (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:33:38 -0400 Received: (qmail 25461 invoked by uid 107); 15 Sep 2011 20:34:31 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:34:31 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:33:36 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110916000515.1dfc5665@zappedws> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:05:15AM +0400, Alexey Shumkin wrote: > But as you said > >>This is by design. Git commit messages are intended to have a > >>single-line subject, followed by a blank line, followed by more > >>elaboration > > and solved with "-k" for both "format-patch" and "am" commands OK, that makes sense to me, then. I didn't read Ingo's first message carefully enough, but your response made me scratch my head and read it again. Thanks for the sanity check. -Peff