From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Enrico Weigelt Subject: Re: Does git have "Path-Based Authorization"? Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 16:50:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20111002145007.GA15083@nibiru.local> References: Reply-To: weigelt@metux.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 02 16:54:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RANQa-0003e4-6K for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2011 16:54:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752906Ab1JBOx4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:53:56 -0400 Received: from caprica.metux.de ([82.165.128.25]:48056 "EHLO mailgate.caprica.metux.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752873Ab1JBOxs (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Oct 2011 10:53:48 -0400 Received: from mailgate.caprica.metux.de (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.caprica.metux.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p92EkwCk007509 for ; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 16:46:58 +0200 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mailgate.caprica.metux.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with UUCP id p92EkXRs007500 for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 16:46:33 +0200 Received: (from weigelt@localhost) by nibiru.metux.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) id p92Eo7Hj025074 for git@vger.kernel.org; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 16:50:07 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: git@vger.kernel.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Terror: bin laden, kill bush, Briefbombe, Massenvernichtung, KZ, X-Nazi: Weisse Rasse, Hitlers Wiederauferstehung, 42, X-Antichrist: weg mit schaeuble, ausrotten, heiliger krieg, al quaida, X-Killer: 23, endloesung, Weltuntergang, X-Doof: wer das liest ist doof Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: * Frans Klaver wrote: Putting on my business consultant hat: > If you don't trust them, fix your trust and relationship, not some tool. ACK. We're essentially talking about a social/political problem, bot a technical one. Take my advise, solve the problem on the layer it comes from. The whole ideology of keeping individual devs on their little tiny isle is to have the whole project structured into such little islands in the first place. Meaning: a really strong compartimentalization. This requires an strictly modular architecture (which essentially means having completely separate trees for the individual modules) and, of course, good requirements engineering, contract-driven development, etc, with all the associated role models, etc, etc. What kind of project are we talking about ? Tactical control or nuclear plant systems ? cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt@metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------