From: Peter Oberndorfer <kumbayo84@arcor.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/WIP PATCH] Use config value rebase.editor as editor when starting git rebase -i
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:16:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201110112316.11738.kumbayo84@arcor.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vipnvfk70.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2011, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Peter Oberndorfer <kumbayo84@arcor.de> writes:
>
> > Using $GIT_EDITOR or core.editor config var for this is not possible
> > since it is also used to start the commit message editor for reword action.
>
> Your tool _could_ be smart about this issue and inspect the contents to
> launch a real editor when it is fed a material not for sequencing, but
> that feels hacky.
I already tried this, but my first version did not redirect stdin/stdout
so vi stayed in background and the whole thing just hung.
I did not try further because i assumed more problems would appear
when redirecting stdin/stdout...
> > * GIT_EDITOR env var is not honored anymore after this change.
>
> Care to explain? "git var" knows magic about a few variables like
> GIT_EDITOR and GIT_PAGER.
>
> $ git config core.editor vim
> $ GIT_EDITOR=vi EDITOR=emacs git var GIT_EDITOR
> vi
> $ unset GIT_EDITOR; EDITOR=emacs git var GIT_EDITOR
> emacs
Sorry i was wrong, i missed that git var looks at $GIT_EDITOR.
So the sequence for choosing the sequencer editor is:
$GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR
config sequence.editor
var GIT_EDITOR
Which looks OK to me.
> > * Should git_rebase_editor be in git-rebase--interactive.sh instead
>
> Probably yes.
OK, will do.
>
> > * How should the config be called?
>
> Given that in the longer term we would be using a unified sequencer
> machinery for not just rebase-i but for am and cherry-pick, I would advise
> against calling this anything "rebase". How does "sequence.edit" sound?
>
I do not really care very much, but how about sequence.editor?
Sounds more similar to core.editor
> You need to be prepared to adjust your code to deal with new kinds of
> sequencing insns in the insn sheet and possibly a format change of the
> insn sheet itself.
I assume instruction sheet is the commented out part that looks like:
# Commands:
# p, pick = use commit
# r, reword = use commit, but edit the commit message
Currently all lines starting with # are ignored.
(They are also not written to the output when finished
which is a point I might have to change...)
Also the instructions are currently not taken from this instruction sheet.
They are all hardcoded.
Thanks for the feedback
Greetings Peter
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-11 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-11 17:56 [RFC/WIP PATCH] Use config value rebase.editor as editor when starting git rebase -i Peter Oberndorfer
2011-10-11 18:15 ` Phil Hord
2011-10-11 18:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-10-11 21:16 ` Peter Oberndorfer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201110112316.11738.kumbayo84@arcor.de \
--to=kumbayo84@arcor.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox