From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update [section.subsection] to reflect
 what git does
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:46:43 -0400
Message-ID: <20111012174643.GA14336@sigill.intra.peff.net>
References: <1318434726-5556-1-git-send-email-cmn@elego.de>
 <20111012162939.GA3055@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Carlos =?utf-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= Nieto <cmn@elego.de>
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 12 19:46:53 2011
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>)
	id 1RE2tG-0002vt-AV
	for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:46:50 +0200
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753720Ab1JLRqq (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git-2@m.gmane.org>);
	Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:46:46 -0400
Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:58601
	"EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751102Ab1JLRqp (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:46:45 -0400
Received: (qmail 12999 invoked by uid 107); 12 Oct 2011 17:46:48 -0000
Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7)
  (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5)
  by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:46:48 -0400
Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:46:43 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111012162939.GA3055@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <git.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/183377>

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:29:39PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> The explanation matches what we do now, but it did end up a bit longer
> than I had hoped. We could make it a lot shorter by:
> 
>   1. Canonicalizing the section and key names that the caller gives to
>      git-config.

Hmm. Scratch that. We seem to do this already in my tests. I'll look
further and try to make a better documentation patch.

-Peff