From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2011, #04; Wed, 12) Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:02:13 -0400 Message-ID: <20111012190213.GA19578@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7vipnu9hbj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 12 21:02:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RE44U-0006P1-Td for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 21:02:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752041Ab1JLTCS (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:02:18 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:58707 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752011Ab1JLTCP (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:02:15 -0400 Received: (qmail 14525 invoked by uid 107); 12 Oct 2011 19:02:18 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:02:18 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:02:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vipnu9hbj.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:48:48AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * jk/name-hash-dirent (2011-10-07) 1 commit > (merged to 'next' on 2011-10-11 at e2ea68b) > + fix phantom untracked files when core.ignorecase is set I didn't see any comment on the original patch, so I assume you're OK with the few extra bytes added to each cache entry? Otherwise, I can try to retool it to keep the directory entries in a separate hash, so only case-insensitive people pay the extra price. I did a few trivial timings, and the extra bytes didn't seem to make any difference. -Peff