From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] remote: add new sync command
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:00:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201111112300.31798.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vvcqqr4wg.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:
>> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>>> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps these 'git remote' commands should be removed in 1.8 then.
>>>
>>> It is true that it was a long-term goal to deprecate many parts of the
>>> "git remote" script that started as a hack to scratch itches "git fetch"
>>> in the older days did not directly scratch for people, e.g. fetching from
>>> multiple remotes in one go.
>>>
>>> I do not think 1.7.X series to 1.8 is a big enough jump to remove
>>> duplicated features, though.
>>
>> I am using "git remote update" to fetch a _subset_ of remotes;
>> does "git fetch" offers such feature already?
>
> Heh, look at builtin/remote.c::update() and report what you see. It just
> calls into "git fetch" and let the command fetch either from a single
> repository or from a remote group. "git remote update" is not even aware
> of the remote groups; the expansion is done by "git fetch".
>
> Whoever added "multiple repositories" feature to "git fetch" in order to
> support "remote update <group>" apparently under-documented it.
Well, it is documented in git-fetch(1), though in slightly piecemeal
fashion.
One difference is that "git remote update" defaults to "default" group
if it is defined, and to "--all" if it isn't. With "git fetch --multiple"
you have to specify it explicitly ("git fetch --multiple" is a no-op,
I think).
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-11 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-07 16:07 [RFC/PATCH] remote: add new sync command Felipe Contreras
2011-11-07 17:22 ` Jeff King
2011-11-07 18:35 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-11-07 18:39 ` Jeff King
2011-11-07 20:51 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-11-07 21:01 ` Jeff King
2011-11-07 21:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-07 21:31 ` Jeff King
2011-11-08 16:43 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-11-08 17:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-08 17:59 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-11-09 3:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-11 10:35 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-11-11 16:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-11-11 22:00 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2011-11-08 17:31 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-11-08 18:14 ` Jeff King
2011-11-11 12:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-11-11 18:13 ` Jeff King
2011-11-12 22:07 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-11-14 12:25 ` Jeff King
2011-11-14 13:57 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-11-21 21:44 ` Jeff King
2011-11-21 23:47 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-11-30 7:01 ` Jeff King
2011-11-30 11:47 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201111112300.31798.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).