From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] add generic terminal prompt function Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:52:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20111208215218.GA12127@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20111208082118.GA1507@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20111208083323.GE26409@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Erik Faye-Lund , Junio C Hamano To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 08 22:52:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RYltC-0001zm-3z for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:52:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752932Ab1LHVwV (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:52:21 -0500 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:44583 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751219Ab1LHVwU (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Dec 2011 16:52:20 -0500 Received: (qmail 31698 invoked by uid 107); 8 Dec 2011 21:58:59 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:58:59 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 08 Dec 2011 16:52:18 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 01:48:33PM -0800, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > @@ -833,6 +838,7 @@ ifeq ($(uname_S),Linux) > > NO_STRLCPY = YesPlease > > NO_MKSTEMPS = YesPlease > > HAVE_PATHS_H = YesPlease > > + HAVE_DEV_TTY = YesPlease > > endif > > Here you use HAVE_DEV_TTY (by the way, I wonder if it could be > automatically detected by ./configure script)... > [...] > ...and here you have NO_DEV_TTY Whoops. Thanks for catching. I converted it to NO_DEV_TTY, which would turn this code on by default (because I think _most_ platforms we use are going to want this), but then I decided to go the conservative route and let platforms opt into it. And of course since my platform is the one that enables it, I didn't notice during my testing. I'll fix it for the next re-roll. -Peff