Re: [PATCH 1/3] test-terminal: give the child an empty stdin TTY

[Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:07:21AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> > Because of the latter, t7006.58ff cause unexpected results if you do:
> >
> >   git rev-list <range> |
> >   while read sha; do
> >     git checkout sha
> >     make test
> >   done
> 
> In the above, lack of dollar-sign in "git checkout $sha" is obvious ;-)
> but I think it is a bug that you are not running make with its stdin
> redirected from /dev/null in the first place.
> 
> Perhaps "make test" should do that for all tests, not just this terminal
> related one? Doing it this way we do not have to worry about other tests
> reading from the standard input by mistake.

That was my thought, as well. We want the test environment to be as
sterile and predictable as possible, so connecting stdin to /dev/null
seems like a sensible thing.

> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index ed82320..7a85237 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -2239,7 +2239,7 @@ export NO_SVN_TESTS
>  ### Testing rules
>  
>  test: all
> -	$(MAKE) -C t/ all
> +	$(MAKE) -C t/ all </dev/null

Is this right place to do it?

It doesn't catch "cd t && make".  I would expect at the least for it to
happen in t/Makefile. But I actually wonder if it should be in
test-lib.sh, as it is as much about cleaning up the test script's
environment as it is about protecting people running "make test" in a
loop. I.e., something like:

diff --git a/t/test-lib.sh b/t/test-lib.sh
index bdd9513..5a38505 100644
--- a/t/test-lib.sh
+++ b/t/test-lib.sh
@@ -198,6 +198,9 @@ else
 	exec 4>/dev/null 3>/dev/null
 fi
 
+exec 6<&0
+exec 0</dev/null
+
 test_failure=0
 test_count=0
 test_fixed=0

One downside of that approach is that it makes it harder to insert
questionable debugging statements into test scripts. E.g., sometimes I
will temporarily throw a "gdb" or even a "bash" invocation into a test
script to investigate a failure. But that would still be possible by
redirecting from "<6".

-Peff