From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Fick Subject: Re: git help prune accuracy? Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:53:52 -0700 Organization: CAF Message-ID: <201112151453.52157.mfick@codeaurora.org> References: <201112151432.09252.mfick@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Git List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 15 22:54:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbJFW-0004lO-AS for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 22:53:58 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759518Ab1LOVxy (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:53:54 -0500 Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:57981 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759376Ab1LOVxx (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:53:53 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6561"; a="147205234" Received: from pdmz-css-vrrp.qualcomm.com (HELO mostmsg01.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.130]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 15 Dec 2011 13:53:53 -0800 Received: from mfick-lnx.localnet (pdmz-snip-v218.qualcomm.com [192.168.218.1]) by mostmsg01.qualcomm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E90E110004C4 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:53:52 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-28-generic; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <201112151432.09252.mfick@codeaurora.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thursday, December 15, 2011 02:32:09 pm Martin Fick wrote: > I admit that I am guessing here, but I was wondering if > this paragraph from git help prune was a incorrect, it > says: > > This runs git fsck --unreachable using all the refs > available in refs/, optionally with additional set of > objects specified on the command line, and prunes all > unpacked objects unreachable from any of these head > objects from the object database. In addition, it > prunes the unpacked objects that are also found in packs > by running git prune-packed. > > The last sentence seems like it should maybe have the > following fix: > > s/it prunes the unpacked/it prunes the unreferenced/ Ack, I meant: s/it prunes the unpacked/it prunes the unreachable/ -Martin -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. which is a member of Code Aurora Forum