* git 1.7.7.5
@ 2011-12-16 10:57 Jonathan Nieder
2011-12-19 9:41 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-12-20 0:03 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Nieder @ 2011-12-16 10:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
Hi Junio,
I noticed that v1.7.7.5 was tagged a few days ago (b36dcd72), but
there is no corresponding tarball at
http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list
Will there be an official tarball?
I don't mind either way, but it would be useful to know whether
distributors should make their own or just wait.
Thanks,
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git 1.7.7.5
2011-12-16 10:57 git 1.7.7.5 Jonathan Nieder
@ 2011-12-19 9:41 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-12-19 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-20 0:03 ` Junio C Hamano
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Jarosch @ 2011-12-19 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Nieder; +Cc: Junio C Hamano, git
On Friday, 16. December 2011 11:57:58 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> I noticed that v1.7.7.5 was tagged a few days ago (b36dcd72), but
> there is no corresponding tarball at
>
> http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list
>
> Will there be an official tarball?
>
> I don't mind either way, but it would be useful to know whether
> distributors should make their own or just wait.
Looks like a bug, the front page of "git-scm.com" also shows 1.7.7.5
as latest stable release and leads to a dead link.
Cheers,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git 1.7.7.5
2011-12-19 9:41 ` Thomas Jarosch
@ 2011-12-19 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-12-19 20:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Jarosch; +Cc: Jonathan Nieder, git
Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com> writes:
> On Friday, 16. December 2011 11:57:58 Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> I noticed that v1.7.7.5 was tagged a few days ago (b36dcd72), but
>> there is no corresponding tarball at
>>
>> http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list
>>
>> Will there be an official tarball?
>>
>> I don't mind either way, but it would be useful to know whether
>> distributors should make their own or just wait.
>
> Looks like a bug, the front page of "git-scm.com" also shows 1.7.7.5
> as latest stable release and leads to a dead link.
There actually is no bug; I just haven't got around to generating signed
tarballs yet.
I tend to agree that after 1.7.8 was released, showing 1.7.7.5 as the
latest stable indeed a bug (1.7.8 is still the latest stable and the next
latest stable will be 1.7.8.1), but that site is not under my direct
control, so...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git 1.7.7.5
2011-12-16 10:57 git 1.7.7.5 Jonathan Nieder
2011-12-19 9:41 ` Thomas Jarosch
@ 2011-12-20 0:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-21 17:20 ` Thomas Jarosch
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-12-20 0:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Nieder; +Cc: git
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> writes:
> I noticed that v1.7.7.5 was tagged a few days ago (b36dcd72), but
> there is no corresponding tarball at
>
> http://code.google.com/p/git-core/downloads/list
>
> Will there be an official tarball?
>
> I don't mind either way, but it would be useful to know whether
> distributors should make their own or just wait.
I personally would prefer distros to get stuff from the tagged release
point directly from SCM themselves, instead of using tarballs, but anyway
I've uploaded both 1.7.7.5 and 1.7.6.5 tarballs.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git 1.7.7.5
2011-12-20 0:03 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2011-12-21 17:20 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-12-21 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Jarosch @ 2011-12-21 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: Jonathan Nieder, git, schacon
On Tuesday, 20. December 2011 01:03:29 Junio C Hamano wrote:
> but anyway I've uploaded both 1.7.7.5 and 1.7.6.5 tarballs.
Thanks!
May be Scott Chacon can provide you commit access to git-scm.com ;)
If you are interested in this of course.
For example wikipedia lists git-scm.com as website for git.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29)
Cheers,
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: git 1.7.7.5
2011-12-21 17:20 ` Thomas Jarosch
@ 2011-12-21 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-12-21 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Jarosch; +Cc: Jonathan Nieder, git, schacon
Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com> writes:
> May be Scott Chacon can provide you commit access to git-scm.com ;)
> If you are interested in this of course.
>
> For example wikipedia lists git-scm.com as website for git.
> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Git_%28software%29)
No, thanks.
They volunteered to keep the site up to date and useful to the user
community and they have been doing a good job at it, and that is why we
advertise git-scm.com as the official site. A minor bug like this which I
know they are perfectly capable of fixing at their site is not a
justifiable incident to trigger taking control and credit over from them.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-21 19:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-16 10:57 git 1.7.7.5 Jonathan Nieder
2011-12-19 9:41 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-12-19 20:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-20 0:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-21 17:20 ` Thomas Jarosch
2011-12-21 19:10 ` Junio C Hamano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).