From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] config: add include directive
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 11:54:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120126165456.GA5278@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F2119E6.8010109@viscovery.net>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 10:16:22AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > +test_expect_success 'recursive relative paths' '
> > + mkdir subdir &&
> > + echo "[test]three = 3" >subdir/three &&
> > + echo "[include]path = three" >subdir/two &&
> > + echo "[include]path = subdir/two" >base &&
> > + echo 3 >expect &&
> > + git config -f base test.three >actual &&
> > + test_cmp expect actual
> > +'
>
> Isn't it rather "chained relative paths"? Recursive would be if I write
>
> [include]path = .gitconfig
>
> in my ~/.gitconfig. What happens in this case?
Good point. I used "recursive" because it is recursing in the include
function within git, but obviously from the user's perspective, it is
not a recursion.
And no, I didn't do any cycle detection. We could either do:
1. Record some canonical name for each source we look at (probably
realpath() for files, and the sha1 for refs), and don't descend
into already-seen sources.
2. Simply provide a maximum depth, and don't include beyond it.
The latter is much simpler to implement, but I think the former is a
little nicer for the user.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-26 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-26 7:35 [RFC/PATCH 0/4] config include directives Jeff King
2012-01-26 7:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] config: add include directive Jeff King
2012-01-26 9:16 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-01-26 16:54 ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-01-26 20:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-26 22:25 ` Jeff King
2012-01-26 22:43 ` Jeff King
2012-01-26 20:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-26 22:51 ` Jeff King
2012-01-27 5:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-27 5:55 ` Jeff King
2012-01-27 17:03 ` Jens Lehmann
2012-01-27 0:02 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-01-27 0:32 ` Jeff King
2012-01-27 9:33 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-01-27 5:07 ` Michael Haggerty
2012-01-27 5:54 ` Jeff King
2012-01-26 7:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] config: factor out config file stack management Jeff King
2012-01-26 7:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] config: support parsing config data from buffers Jeff King
2012-01-26 7:42 ` [PATCH 4/4] config: allow including config from repository blobs Jeff King
2012-01-26 9:25 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-01-26 17:22 ` Jeff King
2012-01-27 3:47 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-01-27 5:57 ` Jeff King
2012-01-26 21:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-26 23:00 ` Jeff King
2012-01-27 0:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-27 0:49 ` Jeff King
2012-01-27 5:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-27 5:42 ` Jeff King
2012-01-27 7:27 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-01-27 23:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-27 4:01 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-01-27 5:59 ` Jeff King
2012-01-27 9:51 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/4] config include directives Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2012-01-27 17:34 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120126165456.GA5278@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).