From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Walrond Subject: Re: Bug report: stash in upstream caused remote fetch to fail Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 22:37:44 +0000 Message-ID: <20120201223743.GC2431@localhost.localdomain> References: <20120201165952.GA16263@proteus> <874nvap9hj.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 01 23:38:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsioR-0007z3-8k for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 23:38:00 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756127Ab2BAWhy (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:37:54 -0500 Received: from gimli.pitney-fabs.co.uk ([87.106.140.52]:39162 "EHLO gimli.pitney-fabs.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755366Ab2BAWhx (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:37:53 -0500 Received: from host-78-151-87-122.as13285.net ([78.151.87.122] helo=localhost.localdomain) by gimli.pitney-fabs.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsioJ-0000tx-EQ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:37:52 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874nvap9hj.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:46:48PM +0100, Thomas Rast wrote: > > Do you, by any chance, still have a copy of the upstream repo before you > trashed the stash? It would be interesting to know whether there was > actually some repository corruption going on (that went unnoticed by > fsck, no less) or if there was a bug in the transmission. I tried to reproduce the problem but without success :( Disk corruption is unlikely - raided drives etc etc. More likely stash related somehow as I was applying patches manually on older versions checked out in a temp branch, stashing the results then applying the stash onto master/HEAD. But why was a remote clone involved with the upstream stash at all I wonder?? Andrew Walrond