From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Alternates corruption issue Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:53:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20120203215307.GA3472@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20120131214740.GA2465@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20120131215501.GF13252@burratino> <20120131220510.GA3253@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20120131222258.GG13252@burratino> <20120202215913.GA26727@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vzkd0u4ik.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120203120215.GA31441@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v8vkjstq2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120203212906.GB1890@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vmx8zmvq2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Richard Purdie , GIT Mailing-list , "Hart, Darren" , "Ashfield, Bruce" To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 03 22:53:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RtR4F-0004kT-RC for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:53:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757959Ab2BCVxL (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:53:11 -0500 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:56037 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754779Ab2BCVxJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2012 16:53:09 -0500 Received: (qmail 2582 invoked by uid 107); 3 Feb 2012 22:00:15 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:00:15 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:53:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vmx8zmvq2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Feb 03, 2012 at 01:51:33PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jeff King writes: > > >> No, thanks for working on this. > > > > What do you want to do with it, then? Take my patch and ignore the > > gitfile issue, or have me refactor it more heavily? I could go either > > way. > > How about queuing it as is in next and see if anybody screams loudly > enough so that we can fix-up if necessary in-tree? Sounds good to me. Jonathan might be interested in building on top of it, too. -Peff