Re: [PATCH 2/3] tag: die when listing missing or corrupt objects

[Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]

On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 10:13:27AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
> 
> > OK, that's easy enough to do. Should we show lightweight tags to commits
> > for backwards compatibility (and just drop the parse_signature junk in
> > that case)? The showing of blobs or trees is the really bad thing, I
> > think.
> 
> For now, dropping 3/3 and queuing this instead...
> 
> ---
> Subject: tag: do not show non-tag contents with "-n"

Since jk/maint-tag-show-fixes is still in pu, perhaps we can squash in
this test from my 3/3:

diff --git a/t/t7004-tag.sh b/t/t7004-tag.sh
index e93ac73..0db0f6a 100755
--- a/t/t7004-tag.sh
+++ b/t/t7004-tag.sh
@@ -586,6 +586,19 @@ test_expect_success \
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'annotations for blobs are empty' '
+	blob=$(git hash-object -w --stdin <<-\EOF
+	Blob paragraph 1.
+
+	Blob paragraph 2.
+	EOF
+	) &&
+	git tag tag-blob $blob &&
+	echo "tag-blob        " >expect &&
+	git tag -n1 -l tag-blob >actual &&
+	test_cmp expect actual
+'
+
 # trying to verify annotated non-signed tags:
 
 test_expect_success GPG \

If we want to be more thorough, I can write up a more complete test
battery making sure tags and commits are both shown, but blobs and trees
are not.

-Peff