From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Fick Subject: Re: Git, Builds, and Filesystem Type Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 14:53:38 -0700 Organization: CAF Message-ID: <201202091453.38564.mfick@codeaurora.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git Users To: Hilco Wijbenga X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 09 22:53:48 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rvbw0-0003eJ-CB for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:53:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754271Ab2BIVxk (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:53:40 -0500 Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:44747 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753093Ab2BIVxj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 16:53:39 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6615"; a="159647562" Received: from pdmz-css-vrrp.qualcomm.com (HELO mostmsg01.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.130]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 09 Feb 2012 13:53:39 -0800 Received: from mfick-lnx.localnet (pdmz-snip-v218.qualcomm.com [192.168.218.1]) by mostmsg01.qualcomm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 40CB310004D1; Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:53:39 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-37-generic; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thursday, February 09, 2012 02:23:18 pm Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > For the record, our (Java) project is quite small. It's > 43MB (source and images) and the entire directory tree > after building is about 1.6GB (this includes all JARs > downloaded by Maven). So we're not talking TBs of data. > > Any thoughts on which FSs to include in my tests? Or > simply which FS might be more appropriate? tmpfs is probably fastest hands down if you can use it (even if you have to back it by swap). -Martin -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. which is a member of Code Aurora Forum