From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] test: tests for the "double > from mailmap" bug Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:35:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20120214223515.GA25374@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1329235894-20581-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20120214203431.GB13210@burratino> <20120214211402.GC23291@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20120214220732.GB24802@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Jonathan Nieder , git@vger.kernel.org To: Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 14 23:35:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxQy4-0002rN-Tq for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:35:25 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932623Ab2BNWfU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:35:20 -0500 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:36011 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932563Ab2BNWfU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:35:20 -0500 Received: (qmail 13358 invoked by uid 107); 14 Feb 2012 22:42:30 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:42:30 -0500 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:35:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:22:53AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote: > Better != more words. English, like code, is good as simple as > possible (but not simpler). I'm not going to bother responding to your email point by point, as I have very little else to say. I am telling you that as a reviewer of git patches, I found the more verbose message by Jonathan to be much easier to review than your one-line description. You may disagree. I offer my experience merely as a data point, and I will let others draw their own conclusions. If you want to ignore me, that's your right, but I don't see any point in arguing further about it. -Peff