From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 3/3] push: add 'prune' option
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 17:25:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120217222507.GA31830@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329505957-24595-4-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 09:12:37PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> This will allow us to remove refs from the remote that have been removed
> locally.
>
> It's useful to conveniently synchronize all the local branches to
> certain remote.
Thanks for picking up this topic again.
There's one subtlety in the motivation above that you may find helpful
when you end up writing the documentation: "push --mirror" already does
this sort of pruning, but it _also_ implies that we are pushing
"refs/*:refs/*". So this is really about giving access to the pruning
half, but still being able to use custom refspecs. So the features
together might end up being explained something like:
--prune::
... prune things that no longer exist locally ...
--mirror::
... turn on --prune, and also match all refs ...
At least that is my understanding of how the code is meant to work.
> builtin/push.c | 2 ++
> remote.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> remote.h | 3 ++-
> transport.c | 2 ++
> transport.h | 1 +
> 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
I've just given a quick read to the patches so far, but I did notice
this:
> static char *check_pattern_match(const struct refspec *rs, int rs_nr, struct ref *ref,
> - int send_mirror, const struct refspec **ret_pat)
> + int send_mirror, int dir, const struct refspec **ret_pat)
The "dir" flag looks like it is meant to be short for "direction". But
the callers only pass 0 or 1. I'm not clear which direction is which.
Either symbolic constants for directions, or perhaps giving it a more
boolean name like "match_to_dst" might make it more clear.
I'll try to take a closer look later tonight.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-17 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-17 19:12 [RFC/PATCH 0/3] push: add 'prune' option Felipe Contreras
2012-02-17 19:12 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/3] remote: use a local variable in match_push_refs() Felipe Contreras
2012-02-17 22:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-17 19:12 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/3] remote: reorganize check_pattern_match() Felipe Contreras
2012-02-17 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-22 20:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2012-02-22 21:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-17 19:12 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/3] push: add 'prune' option Felipe Contreras
2012-02-17 22:25 ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-02-17 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-22 20:43 ` Felipe Contreras
2012-02-22 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-22 23:06 ` Felipe Contreras
2012-02-22 23:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-21 15:30 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/3] " Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-02-21 17:35 ` Jeff King
2012-02-22 1:45 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120217222507.GA31830@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).