From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remote-curl: Fix push status report when all branches fail
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 15:40:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120222204050.GB6781@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJo=hJsFDrt4rsxVAnx86bxZDY3yfWc1=GDd8opUU+9z7esLnw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 07:22:10AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Ignore write errors; there's nothing we can do,
> > + * since we're about to close the pipe anyway. And the
> > + * most likely error is EPIPE due to the helper dying
> > + * to report an error itself.
> > + */
> > + sigchain_push(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN);
> > + xwrite(data->helper->in, "\n", 1);
> > + sigchain_pop(SIGPIPE);
> [...]
>
> This sounds right to me. Its unfortunate that we missed the error
> status output when we built the remote helper protocol, but your patch
> above might be the best we can do now.
>
> Eh, well, actually we could have the helper advertise a new capability
> that can be enabled to return exit status. That is a much bigger
> change, and even if we do it for remote-curl (since that is in tree
> and easy to update) we still need your patch for the same race
> condition for out of tree helpers (which Google actually has so I care
> about out of tree helpers too).
I don't think it's worth a new capability. This is one of those "it
would be nice if it were designed that way from day one" cases, but it
wasn't. And while this is a minor hack, I don't think it has any
functional downsides. So adding a new capability on top of the hack just
makes things more complex.
I'll re-send the patch with a stand-alone commit message.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-22 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-19 22:24 [PATCH] remote-curl: Fix push status report when all branches fail Shawn O. Pearce
2012-01-19 22:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-20 3:12 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2012-01-20 5:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-20 6:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-01-20 15:15 ` Shawn Pearce
2012-01-20 16:17 ` Thomas Rast
2012-01-20 17:03 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2012-01-20 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-22 10:13 ` Jeff King
2012-02-22 15:22 ` Shawn Pearce
2012-02-22 20:40 ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-02-23 10:04 ` Jeff King
2012-02-23 19:11 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120222204050.GB6781@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).