From: Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com>
To: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [FYI] very large text files and their problems.
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:11:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120224101121.GA9526@pomac.netswarm.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACsJy8Bdbegs7QdztvsFnKPcpAX5UL7s7uc37wF3_nF4kJQjrQ@mail.gmail.com>
I'm uncertain if you got my reply since i did it out of bounds - so i'll
repeat myself - sorry... =)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 11:18:19PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:49 PM, Ian Kumlien <pomac@vapor.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We just saw a interesting issue, git compressed a ~3.4 gb project to ~57 mb.
>
> How big are those files? How many of them? How often do they change?
This was the first check in, there is no deltas yet.
The file in question is ~3.3 gb in size - ie exactly: 3310214313 bytes
(as seen below in the malloc failure)
git show <blob sha1 id> |wc -c gives the same exact result.
> > But when we tried to clone it on a big machine we got:
> >
> > fatal: Out of memory, malloc failed (tried to allocate
> > 18446744072724798634 bytes)
> >
> > This is already fixed in the 1.7.10 mainline - but it also seems like
>
> Does 1.7.9 have this problem?
Only tested 1.7.8 and 1.7.9.1 - works in mainline git (pre-1.7.10)
> > git needs to have atleast the same ammount of memory as the largest
> > file free... Couldn't this be worked around?
> >
> > On a (32 bit) machine with 4GB memory - results in:
> > fatal: Out of memory, malloc failed (tried to allocate 3310214313 bytes)
> >
> > (and i see how this could be a problem, but couldn't it be mitigated? or
> > is it bydesign and intended behaviour?)
>
> I think that it's delta resolving that hogs all your memory. If your
> files are smaller than 512M, try lower core.bigFileThreshold. The
> topic jc/split-blob, which stores a big file are several smaller
> pieces, might solve your problem. Unfortunately the topic is not
> complete yet.
Well, in this case it's just stream unpacking gzip data to disk, i
understand if delta would be a problem... But wouldn't delta be a
problem in the sence of <size_of_change>+<size_of_subdata>+<result> ?
Ie, if the file is mmapped - it shouldn't have to be allocated, right?
> --
> Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-24 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-22 15:49 [FYI] very large text files and their problems Ian Kumlien
2012-02-22 16:18 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-02-24 10:11 ` Ian Kumlien [this message]
2012-02-24 11:14 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-02-24 12:55 ` Ian Kumlien
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-22 18:39 Ian Kumlien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120224101121.GA9526@pomac.netswarm.net \
--to=pomac@vapor.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).