From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: stripping [PATCH] without losing later tags from mailed patches (Re: [ 02/12] Remove COMPAT_IA32 support) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:45:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20120312184549.GG12405@1wt.eu> References: <20120312002046.041448832@1wt.eu> <1331514446.3022.140.camel@deadeye> <20120312024948.GB4650@kroah.com> <20120312063027.GB8971@1wt.eu> <20120312064855.GB16820@burratino> <20120312085820.GA11569@1wt.eu> <20120312152004.GB9380@kroah.com> <7vfwddu60f.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120312164812.GC12405@1wt.eu> <7v4nttu2gf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Greg KH , Jonathan Nieder , Ben Hutchings , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Rast To: Junio C Hamano X-From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 12 19:46:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: glk-linux-kernel-3@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S7AG7-0002WT-MB for glk-linux-kernel-3@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:46:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756404Ab2CLSqG (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:46:06 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:63199 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751952Ab2CLSqE (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:46:04 -0400 Received: (from willy@localhost) by mail.home.local (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q2CIjnrN014691; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:45:49 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v4nttu2gf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:57:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > I've just backported it to 1.7.9.3 (I'm not keen on living on the bleeding > > edge with my everyday tools), and it works nicely as expected. > > This topic will be backported in later versions of 1.7.9.x track, > but living on the maintenance track does not have much smaller > chance of breakage than living on the tip of 'master' these days, > unless you are using distro packaged version. The usual rule of > thumb if you are compiling from the source is that the tip of > 'master' is more stable than any tagged version, including the > maintenance track. See > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/189657/focus=190814 > > for details. I know, but you see I was running on 1.7.2.3. Generally if one version works for me, I don't upgrade it for a year or two. I've been hit a few times in the past by some quite annoying bugs (as is to be expected from any software in the development branch), and lost a lot of time on this. Rest assured that I don't feel comfortable on 1.7.9 either, that's a big jump for me but I know that most often it works quite well :-) Willy