From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: stripping [PATCH] without losing later tags from mailed patches (Re: [ 02/12] Remove COMPAT_IA32 support) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:54:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20120312185440.GA21817@burratino> References: <20120312024948.GB4650@kroah.com> <20120312063027.GB8971@1wt.eu> <20120312064855.GB16820@burratino> <20120312085820.GA11569@1wt.eu> <20120312152004.GB9380@kroah.com> <20120312152453.GB12405@1wt.eu> <87aa3l4vqq.fsf@thomas.inf.ethz.ch> <20120312165703.GB18791@burratino> <7vvcm9snko.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120312185008.GH12405@1wt.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , Thomas Rast , Greg KH , Ben Hutchings , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, git@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Rast To: Willy Tarreau X-From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 12 19:55:07 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: glk-linux-kernel-3@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S7AOg-0007OT-Ur for glk-linux-kernel-3@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:55:07 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756500Ab2CLSy4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:54:56 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:46362 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756448Ab2CLSyy (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:54:54 -0400 Received: by iagz16 with SMTP id z16so7226999iag.19 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:54:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=r0XO0s9iS21PtlSlquQ5UPpq4LvP10azycLCBc7Dqtg=; b=ItbPiN2vTYiQaFD0D3lpU3Zn10NOdywXqHizMx31Ab1kQ3Uygef505Dep5AaMIQWBN r1Qg34++dFxAPX60Sm3Q/O7HaNTtbf7IGvFenqlUJ6frVaO12mlNDJ5K2uffSPqVYy+z EOmTprqElL5+fz3+KtwOv/Dk+jEtGuDJ/qoIYNpVc482hJe5PH0021KZdDwNLuXcyjqH I1bLsUhPaoEZKxc0zqpNYeRGVg1fK5FRreypuAREzwuIB+1sqThI33y7RUBT4ETzla6w 2ztY1gIJGShC1yn2qzfi1rGBwq2k9hjpmm41dMVU00nkNi4SopgdDPAiRNVmAxw4vbZo mdtQ== Received: by 10.43.126.68 with SMTP id gv4mr16932743icc.30.1331578493999; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from burratino (c-24-1-56-9.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [24.1.56.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c2sm13156301igj.1.2012.03.12.11.54.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 11:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120312185008.GH12405@1wt.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Willy Tarreau wrote: > From my user experience and what I see on a number of coworkers, users > tend to make big jumps when they need a new feature, so in practice, > not offering the option in a version or two would probably not affect > most users, especially the ones still relying on the old behaviour. So > I don't see much benefit in waiting for repurposing the option. The benefit is that if it does turn out to be a regression, early adopters will complain to us because their scripts have stopped working and we get a chance to back out the change without having to worry about others who have started to rely on the option. Regards, Jonathan