git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	"Frederik Schwarzer" <schwarzerf@gmail.com>,
	"Brandon Casey" <drafnel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] test: test cherry-pick functionality and output separately
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 00:00:36 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120313050036.GD12550@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120313045100.GA12474@burratino>

Since v1.7.3-rc0~26^2~9 (revert: report success when using option
--strategy, 2010-07-14), the cherry-pick-many-commits test checks the
format of output written to the terminal during a cherry-pick sequence
in addition to the functionality.  There is no reason those have to
be checked in the same test, though, and it has some downsides:

 - when progress output is broken, the test result does not convey
   whether the functionality was also broken or not

 - it is not immediately obvious when reading that these checks are
   meant to prevent regressions in details of the output format and
   are not just a roundabout way to check functional details like the
   number of commits produced

 - there is a temptation to include the same kind of output checking
   for every new cherry-pick test, which would make future changes
   to the output unnecessarily difficult

Put the tests from v1.7.3-rc0~26^2~9 in separate assertions, following
the principle "test one feature at a time".

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
---
 t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh b/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh
index d909e6db..75f7ff4f 100755
--- a/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh
+++ b/t/t3508-cherry-pick-many-commits.sh
@@ -35,6 +35,16 @@ test_expect_success setup '
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'cherry-pick first..fourth works' '
+	git checkout -f master &&
+	git reset --hard first &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git cherry-pick first..fourth &&
+	git diff --quiet other &&
+	git diff --quiet HEAD other &&
+	check_head_differs_from fourth
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'output to keep user entertained during multi-pick' '
 	cat <<-\EOF >expected &&
 	[master OBJID] second
 	 Author: A U Thor <author@example.com>
@@ -51,15 +61,22 @@ test_expect_success 'cherry-pick first..fourth works' '
 	git reset --hard first &&
 	test_tick &&
 	git cherry-pick first..fourth >actual &&
-	git diff --quiet other &&
-	git diff --quiet HEAD other &&
-
 	sed -e "s/$_x05[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]/OBJID/" <actual >actual.fuzzy &&
-	test_i18ncmp expected actual.fuzzy &&
-	check_head_differs_from fourth
+	test_line_count -ge 3 actual.fuzzy &&
+	test_i18ncmp expected actual.fuzzy
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'cherry-pick --strategy resolve first..fourth works' '
+	git checkout -f master &&
+	git reset --hard first &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git cherry-pick --strategy resolve first..fourth &&
+	git diff --quiet other &&
+	git diff --quiet HEAD other &&
+	check_head_differs_from fourth
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'output during multi-pick indicates merge strategy' '
 	cat <<-\EOF >expected &&
 	Trying simple merge.
 	[master OBJID] second
@@ -79,11 +96,8 @@ test_expect_success 'cherry-pick --strategy resolve first..fourth works' '
 	git reset --hard first &&
 	test_tick &&
 	git cherry-pick --strategy resolve first..fourth >actual &&
-	git diff --quiet other &&
-	git diff --quiet HEAD other &&
 	sed -e "s/$_x05[0-9a-f][0-9a-f]/OBJID/" <actual >actual.fuzzy &&
-	test_i18ncmp expected actual.fuzzy &&
-	check_head_differs_from fourth
+	test_i18ncmp expected actual.fuzzy
 '
 
 test_expect_success 'cherry-pick --ff first..fourth works' '
-- 
1.7.9.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-13  5:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-31 14:24 [PATCH] Correct singular form in diff summary line for human interaction Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2012-01-31 15:20 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-01-31 17:50   ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-01  1:32     ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-02-01  1:45       ` Thomas Dickey
2012-02-01  1:56       ` Thomas Dickey
2012-02-01  2:37         ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-02-01  3:04         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-01  9:40           ` Thomas Dickey
2012-02-01 12:55 ` [PATCH v2] Use correct grammar in diffstat summary line Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2012-02-01 21:26   ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-02 14:22     ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-02-02 18:24       ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-03  1:11         ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2012-02-03  1:18           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-02-03 12:24           ` Jeff King
2012-02-01 23:35   ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-02-02  0:20     ` [RFC/PATCH] i18n: do not define gettext/ngettext in NO_GETTEXT case Jonathan Nieder
2012-02-02  0:27     ` [PATCH v2] Use correct grammar in diffstat summary line Jonathan Nieder
2012-02-02  0:31     ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-13  4:51   ` [RFC/PATCH 0/7] tests: diffstat summary line varies by locale (Re: [PATCH v2] Use correct grammar in diffstat summary line) Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-13  4:54     ` [PATCH 1/7] test: use test_i18ncmp when checking --stat output Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-13  6:00       ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13  6:05         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-13  6:13           ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-13  6:06         ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-13  4:58     ` [PATCH 2/7] test: use numstat instead of diffstat in funny-names test Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-13  4:59     ` [PATCH 3/7] test: modernize funny-names test style Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-13  5:00     ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2012-03-13  5:01     ` [PATCH 5/7] test: use --numstat instead of --stat in "git stash show" tests Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-13  5:02     ` [PATCH 6/7] test: use numstat instead of diffstat in binary-diff test Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-13  5:05     ` [PATCH 7/7] diffstat summary line varies by locale: miscellany Jonathan Nieder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120313050036.GD12550@burratino \
    --to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=drafnel@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=schwarzerf@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).