From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@drexel.edu>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Isolate If-Modified-Since handling in gitweb
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:04:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203212104.23192.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120321195520.GB32535@odin.tremily.us>
W. Trevor King wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:22:44PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > "W. Trevor King" <wking@drexel.edu> writes:
> > > > I think it would be better to add initial tests with refactoring, and
> > > > snapshot specific tests with snapshot support, e.g.:
> > > >
> > > > 1/2: gitweb: Refactor If-Modified-Since handling and add tests
> > > > 2/2: gitweb: Add If-Modified-Since support for snapshots
> > >
> > > But the new tests would be for the new functionality (i.e. snapshot
> > > support), so they wouldn't belong in the general refactoring commit.
> >
> > Then you are planning to split it in a wrong way.
> >
> > ... add tests for codepaths that use i-m-s to make sure your
> > refactoring did not break them...
>
> Ah, I was assuming that some current tests might be checking the
> current behavior, and that my new tests would be testing my new
> snapshot behavior. If the old i-m-s handling also needs tests, that
> should happen before any of my previously proposed patches:
>
> 1: tests for i-m-s and git_feed
> 2: refactor i-m-s handling
Those two can be in single commit. Tests added need only test i-m-s
using git_feed ('atom' or 'rss' action), as it is the only user,
and you touch only i-m-s handling.
> 3: tests for i-m-s and git_snapshot (which fail until 4)
> 4: add i-m-s to git_snapshot
We usually put tests together with feature. Tests before feature means
that you would need to mark them as test_expect_failure, as they would
not pass before feature is added, isn't it?
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-21 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-20 0:23 What's cooking in git.git (Mar 2012, #07; Mon, 19) Junio C Hamano
2012-03-15 7:54 ` [PATCH] Pull gitweb If-Modified-Since handling out into its own function and use for snapshots W. Trevor King
2012-03-20 1:48 ` W. Trevor King
2012-03-20 23:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-20 11:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-20 16:40 ` [PATCH v2] " W. Trevor King
2012-03-21 12:11 ` [PATCH v3] Isolate If-Modified-Since handling in gitweb W. Trevor King
2012-03-21 13:19 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-21 14:04 ` W. Trevor King
2012-03-21 16:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-21 17:38 ` W. Trevor King
2012-03-21 19:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-21 19:55 ` W. Trevor King
2012-03-21 20:04 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2012-03-21 20:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-21 20:34 ` W. Trevor King
2012-03-22 13:05 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-21 17:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-22 12:46 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-22 17:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-26 11:09 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] " W. Trevor King
2012-03-26 11:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] gitweb: add `status` headers to git_feed() responses W. Trevor King
2012-03-26 11:12 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] gitweb: refactor If-Modified-Since handling W. Trevor King
2012-03-26 17:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-26 11:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] gitweb: add If-Modified-Since handling to git_snapshot() W. Trevor King
2012-03-26 19:14 ` [PATCH v5 " W. Trevor King
2012-03-27 22:31 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-28 13:58 ` W. Trevor King
2012-03-27 19:24 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Isolate If-Modified-Since handling in gitweb Jakub Narebski
2012-03-27 19:49 ` W. Trevor King
2012-03-27 19:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-27 19:55 ` W. Trevor King
2012-03-27 20:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-26 17:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] gitweb: refactor If-Modified-Since handling W. Trevor King
2012-03-26 18:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-26 19:12 ` [PATCH v5 " W. Trevor King
2012-03-27 22:24 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-28 13:51 ` W. Trevor King
2012-03-28 14:13 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] " wking
2012-03-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] gitweb: add `status` headers to git_feed() responses wking
2012-03-28 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] gitweb: refactor If-Modified-Since handling wking
2012-03-28 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] gitweb: add If-Modified-Since handling to git_snapshot() wking
2012-03-28 16:08 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-28 15:56 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] gitweb: refactor If-Modified-Since handling W. Trevor King
2012-03-20 23:35 ` Incremental updates to What's cooking Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201203212104.23192.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=wking@drexel.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).