From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbyszek@in.waw.pl>,
"Johannes Sixt" <j.sixt@viscovery.net>,
"Peter J. Weisberg" <pj@irregularexpressions.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Demonstrate failure of 'core.ignorecase = true'
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:37:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120322173701.GA11928@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vbonozi8c.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 09:57:23AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Hrm, replacing unclear part with clarified text may make sense, but it
> would not help adding new text if the existing description is not clear
> enough.
>
> How about doing it like this?
>
> Case-insensitive filesystems like FAT and HFS+ have various strange
> behaviours, like reporting that a file "Makefile" already exists when
> the file that actually exists on them is "makefile". By setting this
> variable to `true`, Git employs logic to work around them.
>
> The default is false, except that git-clone[1] and git-init[1] will
> probe the filesystem and set it to `true` as necessary when a new
> repository is created.
IMHO, it suffers from the same problem as the original, which is that it
does tells when to use core.ignorecase, but does not specify what
happens when one sets core.ignorecase to true on a case-sensitive
filesystem. Maybe we should be more explicit about what _does_ happen in
that case (to be honest, I am not completely sure). Or just say that it
is not a supported use case.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-22 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-21 22:50 [PATCH] Demonstrate failure of 'core.ignorecase = true' Peter J. Weisberg
2012-03-21 23:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-22 20:40 ` PJ Weisberg
2012-03-22 21:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-23 10:20 ` Thomas Rast
2012-03-23 17:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-23 18:48 ` Jeff King
2012-03-23 18:57 ` Jeff King
2012-03-22 6:49 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-03-22 11:25 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2012-03-22 14:12 ` Jeff King
2012-03-22 16:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-22 17:37 ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-03-22 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-22 19:07 ` Jeff King
2012-03-22 20:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-22 20:00 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2012-03-22 20:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-22 20:53 ` Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
2012-03-22 20:55 ` PJ Weisberg
2012-03-22 21:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-22 23:00 ` Jeff King
2012-03-22 23:24 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120322173701.GA11928@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=pj@irregularexpressions.net \
--cc=zbyszek@in.waw.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).