From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: "André Walker" <andre@andrewalker.net>
Cc: Tay Ray Chuan <rctay89@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Subject: Re: [RFH] SoC 2012 Guidelines
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:45:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203251745.48858.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F6F3286.5040803@andrewalker.net>
André Walker wrote:
> On 03/25/2012 03:19 AM, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:
> > 2012/3/25 Jakub Narebski<jnareb@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > We really should have more ideas, as it looks like students would be
> > > battling for a few projects (I think there are two would-be students
> > > for any proposed project). Well, too late now.
>
> Right. But would there be room for every student anyhow? Or, at least,
> would there be room for more students if there were more ideas / projects?
I don't know the details of how decision is made on how many project
slots a GSoC organization will get, but in earlier GSoC (see Git Wiki)
we get 2 to 6 projects (IIRC).
One limitation is number of possible mentors.
> > Looking through the ideas page on the wiki, it's not that we don't
> > have enough ideas, it's just that students are all "clustering" around
> > a few proposals (or just one, to be exact).
>
> Which proposal (or proposals) is that?
"Improving parallelism in various commands" (3-4 proposals), "Designing
a faster index format" (2-3 proposals), "Remote helper for Subversion"
(this has 1 proposal I think), "Modernizing and expanding Git.pm"
(2 proposals), "Use JavaScript library / framework in gitweb"
(2 proposals), 'Complete "Linus's ultimate content tracking tool"'
(0.5 proposal).
That is from what I remember, and from public and not so public info
I have available. There might be dragons^W errors.
> > I wonder if they are aware of this, given that they most probably
> > aren't subscribed to the list and thus wouldn't see "competing"
> > proposals.
>
> Yes, at least I'm aware :) But I think it would be good to everybody if
> we could manage to get us students to talk and pick one different
> proposal each, specially if there is a possibility to get more people to
> participate in GSoC for Git.
BTW. according to Google Summer of Code FAQ there can be more than one
student working on the same project. Though IIRC it never happened in
history of Git participation in GSoC, isn't it?
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-25 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-24 16:11 [RFH] SoC 2012 Guidelines Jakub Narebski
2012-03-24 16:18 ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-25 6:19 ` Tay Ray Chuan
2012-03-25 14:58 ` André Walker
2012-03-25 15:45 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2012-03-25 17:14 ` André Walker
2012-03-25 22:35 ` elton sky
2012-03-26 4:11 ` Felipe Tanus
2012-03-27 5:41 ` Jeff King
2012-03-26 8:55 ` Kevin
2012-03-27 5:57 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201203251745.48858.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=andre@andrewalker.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=rctay89@gmail.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).