From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Ben Walton <bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca>
Cc: jrnieder@gmail.com, gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use SHELL_PATH to fork commands in run_command.c:prepare_shell_cmd
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:34:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120327033420.GC17338@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120327032917.GB17338@sigill.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:29:17PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> > +#ifndef SHELL_PATH
> > +# define SHELL_PATH "sh"
> > +#endif
>
> Does this default ever kick in? The Makefile defaults SHELL_PATH to
> /bin/sh, so we will always end up with at least that.
>
> Doing so at least makes us consistent across builds, but I wonder if we
> should leave it as "sh" on systems that do not set SHELL_PATH manually.
> Executing "sh" via the PATH is the normal system() thing to do. I doubt
> many people have an "sh" in their PATH ahead of /bin/sh, but if they do,
> we are changing the behavior for them for no good reason.
>
> The whole SHELL_PATH and SANE_TOOL_PATH mess is about helping people on
> less-abled systems, and I do not mind bending the usual conventions to
> make things more convenient on those systems (e.g., by not doing the
> PATH lookup of the shell name). But it would be nice if that bending did
> not affect people on more mainstream systems.
I think you could do that pretty easily with this in the Makefile:
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index be1957a..fcd6896 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -528,6 +528,9 @@ BINDIR_PROGRAMS_NO_X += git-cvsserver
# Set paths to tools early so that they can be used for version tests.
ifndef SHELL_PATH
SHELL_PATH = /bin/sh
+ SHELL_NAME = sh
+else
+ SHELL_NAME = $(SHELL_PATH)
endif
ifndef PERL_PATH
PERL_PATH = /usr/bin/perl
and then just pass and use $SHELL_NAME in run-command.c (I guess you'd
have to make a $SHELL_NAME_SQ, too).
One other option not discussed: what if you always just used the
basename of $SHELL_PATH? That would fix your problem (it would do "bash
-c" instead of "sh -c"), while keeping the same PATH-lookup semantics
that exist now. The only setup it wouldn't help is somebody who uses
/some/other/sh, then still has /bin in their PATH before /some/other.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-27 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-25 12:31 [PATCH 0/2] Make run-command.c honour SHELL_PATH Ben Walton
2012-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] run-command.c: Define SHELL_PATH macro for use in prepare_shell_cmd Ben Walton
2012-03-25 12:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] Makefile: Set EXTRA_CPPFLAGS during the compilation of run-command Ben Walton
2012-03-26 1:11 ` [PATCH 0/2] Make run-command.c honour SHELL_PATH Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-26 13:38 ` Ben Walton
2012-03-26 18:12 ` Jeff King
2012-03-26 18:19 ` Ben Walton
2012-03-26 18:24 ` Jeff King
2012-03-27 2:41 ` [PATCH] Use SHELL_PATH to fork commands in run_command.c:prepare_shell_cmd Ben Walton
2012-03-27 3:29 ` Jeff King
2012-03-27 3:34 ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-03-27 5:01 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-27 5:12 ` Jeff King
2012-03-27 5:53 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-27 6:23 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-03-28 2:46 ` Ben Walton
2012-03-28 4:22 ` Jeff King
2012-03-28 23:26 ` [PATCH] Use SHELL_PATH from build system " Ben Walton
2012-03-29 4:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-03-29 6:09 ` Jonathan Nieder
[not found] ` <1333073831-sup-5734@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca>
2012-03-30 6:32 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-29 23:00 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-28 23:28 ` [PATCH] Use SHELL_PATH to fork commands " Ben Walton
2012-03-27 4:26 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-27 4:49 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-27 2:45 ` [PATCH 0/2] Make run-command.c honour SHELL_PATH Ben Walton
2012-03-26 18:17 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-03-26 18:08 ` Jeff King
2012-03-26 17:58 ` Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120327033420.GC17338@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=bwalton@artsci.utoronto.ca \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).