From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: git://github.com/some/thing.git/? Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:28:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20120328042826.GC30251@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <7vpqbyjbbx.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120327163339.GA5941@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vd37xj3zh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120327183833.GB8460@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20120327184754.GA27070@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Junio C Hamano , Scott Chacon , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 28 06:28:40 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SCkUt-0004Q7-98 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 06:28:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751103Ab2C1E23 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:28:29 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:34874 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750804Ab2C1E23 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:28:29 -0400 Received: (qmail 10958 invoked by uid 107); 28 Mar 2012 04:28:47 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:28:47 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:28:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120327184754.GA27070@burratino> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:47:54PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > For some definition of "we"; AFAICT, github has never allowed this, and > > this is the first complaint > > I complained and got a dismissive response about two years ago. ;-) I > am not sure if bugs from back then are tracked any more. The URL in > my records is [1]. I wasn't able to find the original discussion, as we've migrated through a few different support systems in the last few years. Probably it is in there somewhere, but I don't usually do support stuff, and I didn't think it was worth bothering the regular support people with it. > > However, it turned out to be a one-line patch. I've pushed it out for > > review by other GitHubbers. > > Hoorah! Thanks for taking care of it. FYI, this is now deployed, and the various front-end machines are getting updated slowly over the next few hours (until then, it's non-deterministic whether it will work for you or not :) ). -Peff