git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: chaitanyaa nalla <nallachaitu@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GSoC idea: adding JavaScript library / framework in gitweb
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:14:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203291114.15284.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACeyogf_ssqS6LdiYiopkh8UYGiBw5Cm06e-sut_y33cimiMJQ@mail.gmail.com>

Please remove those parts of quoted (cited) message that are irrelevant
to your response.  Try to not top-post, either.

On Wed, 28 Mar 2012, chaitanyaa nalla wrote:

> I forgot to add this feature to employ JavaScript syntax highlighter
> to pretty-print contents of the blob view.

O.K.  Anyway, I think adding this feature is optional, as time permits;
especially that it is, I think, not easy.

> Here are my views regarding which JavaScript library to use.
> I want to stick to one or two libraries, as I don't want to
> mix things up which is a bad practise.

This is a good idea.

> For DOM manipulation jQuery is better than others.
> For graphics representation Raphael library or Dojo is better.
> If one need robust Object Oriented platform, Dojo is better.
> Based on popularity, light weight jQuery library is pretty famous
> because of its simplicity and power, it got added advantage that
> Microsoft's ASP.Net and Nokia are supporting it.
> YUI is modular.
> MooTools lets have us our own way .. http://jqueryvsmootools.com/
> Please take a look at this link:
>
>    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks.

What is lacking in above description and comparison of various 
JavaScript frameworks is note about *your familiarity* with said 
libraries.

> Based on the goal of the project, I would prefer jQuery as it is well
> tested, robust, simple to use, widely popular, has good support for
> DOM manipulating, is fast (performance) in most cases.

Additional advantage is that there are many CDN (Content Delivery
Network) for jQuery that one can use.

I also think that for gitweb, where goal is to enhance its views
(rather than creating JavaScript app like e.g. GMail or Google Docs),
lightweight and popular jQuery library might be a best choice.

> Though for graphics I would go for Raphael.js, as it has clean
> and neat API similar to jQuery, and it has good graphics support.

Well, if there is time for adding client-side graphical history view
to gitweb, Raphael.js seems like a good choice.  But I am afraid that
this feature it as large as separate GSoC project.


P.S. Another source of inspiration for JavaScript usage in gitweb might
be git-browser project.  Just FYI.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-29  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-24  6:32 gsoc idea adding javascript library / framework in gitweb chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-24 13:17 ` GSoC idea: adding JavaScript " Jakub Narebski
2012-03-24 16:09   ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-24 16:48     ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-24 18:49     ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-24 18:57       ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-25  8:31       ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-25 17:55         ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-25 18:08           ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-26  0:44             ` Jakub Narebski
     [not found]           ` <CACeyogdhChrGe-k+VLkAzq1F9U1TFYsCN5Kc_u7jAwRhaz+fJQ@mail.gmail.com>
2012-03-27 14:55             ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-27 19:14             ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-27 20:35               ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-28 10:38                 ` Jakub Narebski
2012-03-28 18:05                   ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-29  9:14                     ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2012-03-29 18:37                       ` chaitanyaa nalla
2012-03-30 13:29                         ` Jakub Narebski
2012-04-01  9:47                           ` chaitanya nalla
     [not found]                       ` <CACeyogeh7SSfx5NPFSt=gDdUzrUj0zxQKh84MDA-dW2e7UNGcw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-03-30 12:56                         ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201203291114.15284.jnareb@gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nallachaitu@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).