From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonathan Nieder Subject: Re: GSOC Proposal draft: git-remote-svn Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:21:00 -0500 Message-ID: <20120403222100.GA20252@burratino> References: <11292500.AVmZFUUvNi@flobuntu> <2148933.pnpYo0xMAP@flomedio> <2487557.B8qfnaixh3@flomedio> <4F7A258C.5000200@pileofstuff.org> <20120402222958.GD13969@burratino> <4F7A3450.7000302@pileofstuff.org> <20120403000945.GA15075@burratino> <4F7B7169.4050507@pileofstuff.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Florian Achleitner , Ramkumar Ramachandra , David Barr , Git Mailing List , Sverre Rabbelier , Dmitry Ivankov To: Andrew Sayers X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 04 00:21:26 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SFC6P-0004gP-4P for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:21:25 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754953Ab2DCWVU (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:21:20 -0400 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:47698 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754133Ab2DCWVT (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:21:19 -0400 Received: by yenl12 with SMTP id l12so136379yen.19 for ; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:21:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=3PeFlEN1sr0jqxDNXowrAe9KgMNFG6r0FXAFZN6j1SY=; b=RDoe+qS4QD6MI3QdH7c5utzsvVxSFjMvmXSApBCnWvtptjI72SQ59bQ4MtX0ErCAYB wIZtWHTZ/CCg1AhuVQTFkRje+QLmZkGRIHpZ0onwDq1B5H6EBNhhPWMsYiu0KzDxLzRC fJJE4Lyowyb1CmLA5Dab+NNsR04lexqsO9epk6DMH6AzEmSUag/Z/q74fkPLOJURXmmw 1j4yBO3XixiPU1oH4fQjCCoyNAsncNvNjh5denRGQIxssdllcDSXlLUMj3Ye/00YTLvd mQTFLfXsm6YLflSHcKPxCTIY/lNrEQBjpSzYHV3YtQWB/hniWoj3P7z3ygMsSbazdAX4 VcfQ== Received: by 10.50.187.233 with SMTP id fv9mr3376076igc.34.1333491679225; Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:21:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from burratino (c-24-1-56-9.hsd1.il.comcast.net. [24.1.56.9]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gh8sm12284497igb.16.2012.04.03.15.21.17 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 03 Apr 2012 15:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F7B7169.4050507@pileofstuff.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andrew Sayers wrote: > This is a pretty solid heuristic for detecting branches copied from an > existing branch even in scheme (2) or (3), but does absolutely nothing > for trunk detection. Although trunk detection is trivial in the sane > case (the "trunk" directory is the one and only trunk, end of story), > here's a contrived example for why it's hard in the general case: For the remote helper in its default configuration, I think it's ok to assume the standard layout (trunk/, branches/*, tags/*). Thanks for some useful examples. Sincerely, Jonathan