From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Status shows untracked directory without any untracked file in it Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 18:04:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20120406220401.GA31346@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <20120406061447.GC25301@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Kostikov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 07 00:04:15 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SGHGL-0007Tg-OZ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:04:10 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932223Ab2DFWEE (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2012 18:04:04 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:52804 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754674Ab2DFWED (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Apr 2012 18:04:03 -0400 Received: (qmail 12634 invoked by uid 107); 6 Apr 2012 22:04:06 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:04:06 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 06 Apr 2012 18:04:01 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: [Please keep replies on the list, so others can benefit from the discussion. And please don't top-post.] On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:30:20AM -0700, Alexander Kostikov wrote: > Windows. 1.7.9.msysgit.0 > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Jeff King wrote: > > > > Maybe. What git version and what platform are you on? There was a bug in > > versions of git earlier than v1.7.8 that showed the symptom you describe > > on case-insensitive filesystems. It was fixed by commit 2548183, which > > contains more details. Your version should have the fix, so it may be a new issue. Is it easily reproducible? Can you share a short reproduction recipe, or possibly share the repo showing the problem? -Peff