git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 'git log' numbering commits?
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 04:41:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120412084122.GG31122@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F868A24.9090004@monom.org>

On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 09:54:12AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:

> My workflow involves a lot of "git rebase -i". For figuring out which
> commit id to use I do first a 'git log --oneline'. Then I do copy past
> the id to the 'git rebase -i'. The reason why I don't use relative
> id such as HEAD~4, because I keep miscounting the commits.
> 
> So my question is there a magic option to have git log to enumerate the
> commits, e.g.
> 
> 1: 2fcd2b3 network: Remove unused function
> 2: b376b2a session: Fix introspection for Change()
> 3: 15c9cd0 wifi: Refactor desctruction of network object
> 4: a9c699f network: Remove device pointer in network_remove()

No, there is no such feature. You can do this:

  git log --oneline | nl "-s: "

but that will just give you the count of commits shown. If the history
is not a single line of development, then those numbers will become
meaningless quickly. Also note that there is an off-by-one in this
scheme; HEAD~2 will be numbered as "3".

If you wanted to simply decorate each commit with a more readable name,
you could do this:

  git log --format='%H: %s' |
  git name-rev --stdin --name-only

though for simplicity, you may find that you prefer to name only based on
the current tip. You can do that like this:

  git log --format='%H: %s' |
  git name-rev --stdin --name-only \
    --refs `git symbolic-ref HEAD`

which yields output like:

  your-topic: network: Remove unused function
  your-topic~1: session: Fix introspection for Change()
  your-topic~2: wifi: Refactor desctruction of network object
  your-topic~3: network: Remove device pointer in network_remove()

However, if you really just want this to make "rebase -i" easier, have
you considered setting the upstream branch config for your branches?
When I create a topic branch, I do:

  git checkout -b topic origin/master

And then "git rebase -i @{upstream}" rebases everything up to my
upstream branch (origin/master). That may be slightly more than I want,
but it lets me see the whole series in the "rebase -i" sequencer. Recent
versions of git even default to "@{upstream}", so you can just say "git rebase
-i".

How do you usually create your branches? What version of git are you
using (the "@{upstream}" default is in v1.7.6 and later)?

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-12  8:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-12  7:54 'git log' numbering commits? Daniel Wagner
2012-04-12  8:41 ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-04-12  9:15   ` Daniel Wagner
2012-04-12 18:14     ` Philippe Vaucher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120412084122.GG31122@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wagi@monom.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).