From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Clemens Buchacher Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-daemon wrapper to wait until daemon is ready Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:00:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20120414190056.GC3915@ecki> References: <20120414182907.GA3915@ecki> <1334428952-sup-5241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Zbigniew =?utf-8?Q?J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= , git , gitster , Jeff King To: Ben Walton X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 14 21:02:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SJ8FE-0000Dr-PQ for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 21:02:49 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755834Ab2DNTCa (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:02:30 -0400 Received: from smtpout11.highway.telekom.at ([195.3.96.69]:22888 "EHLO email.aon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755767Ab2DNTCN (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Apr 2012 15:02:13 -0400 Received: (qmail 20679 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2012 19:02:09 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.0 (2007-05-01) on WARSBL505.highway.telekom.at X-Spam-Level: **** Received: from p5b22d2b0.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO [127.0.0.1]) (aon.912301525.1@aon.at@[91.34.210.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smarthub78.res.a1.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 14 Apr 2012 19:02:09 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1334428952-sup-5241@pinkfloyd.chass.utoronto.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 02:43:41PM -0400, Ben Walton wrote: > > > The shell script which is currently used to parse git daemon output does > > not seem to work unreliably. In order to work around such issues, > > Presumably you mean "work reliably" here? Yes, that's what I meant the commit message to say. Thanks for noticing. But I would like to wait for more info from the OP before we conclude that this is indeed the case.