From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>
Cc: Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Subject: Re: gc --aggressive
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:58:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120417215801.GA10797@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vpqbomqqdxo.fsf@bauges.imag.fr>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 10:52:03PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > + 3. `git gc --aggressive`; this is often much slower than (2) because git
> > + throws out all of the existing deltas and recomputes them from
> > + scratch. It uses a higher window parameter meaning it will spend
> > + more time computing, and it may end up with a smaller pack. However,
> > + unless the repository is known to have initially been poorly packed,
> > + this option is not needed and will just cause git to perform
> > + extra work.
>
> I like your patch.
Me too. I guess it is not surprising since I wrote the initial draft. ;)
> Maybe you should elaborate on "unless the repository is known to have
> initially been poorly packed". My understanding is that --aggressive was
> implemented to be called after an import from another VCS that would
> have computed very poor deltas, but I'm not sure about the details.
Yes, that's exactly it. fast-import will generate packs, but they are
often not optimal. So if you have done a big import, you should
definitely "git gc --aggressive" as the final step. I don't know how
something like a remote-helper would work, where it is fast-importing
little bits at a time. Probably a regular repack would be fine, since it
will be considering deltas between objects in different packs anyway.
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 16:16 gc --aggressive Jay Soffian
2012-04-17 17:53 ` Jay Soffian
2012-04-17 20:52 ` Matthieu Moy
2012-04-17 21:58 ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-04-28 12:25 ` Jeff King
2012-04-28 17:11 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-04-29 11:34 ` Jeff King
2012-04-29 13:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-01 16:28 ` Jeff King
2012-05-01 17:16 ` Jeff King
2012-05-01 17:59 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-01 18:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-01 19:22 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-01 20:01 ` Jeff King
2012-05-01 19:35 ` Jeff King
2012-05-01 20:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-01 17:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-05-01 17:22 ` Jeff King
2012-05-01 17:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-04-28 16:56 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-04-17 22:08 ` Jeff King
2012-04-17 22:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-17 22:18 ` Jeff King
2012-04-17 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-04-28 16:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-04-18 8:49 ` Andreas Ericsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120417215801.GA10797@sigill.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).