From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Haberman <stephen@exigencecorp.com>,
Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] rebase -p: do not redo the merge, but cherry-pick first-parent changes
Date: Tue, 22 May 2012 18:38:21 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120522233821.GA31667@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FBAA33D.1080703@kdbg.org>
Johannes Sixt wrote:
> - The 'git merge' invocation passed the commit message of the old merge
> commit, but it still obeyed the merge.log option. If it was set, the log
> ended up twice in the commit message.
Likewise for the "Conflicts:" paragraph, which should also be pretty
simple to fix directly. I don't think that points directly to a
fundamental flaw in the current implementation, but it does make it
seem like no one has been using "rebase -p" for anything nontrivial. :)
[...]
> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> @@ -312,12 +312,14 @@ pick_one_preserving_merges () {
> msg_content="$(commit_message $sha1)"
> # No point in merging the first parent, that's HEAD
> new_parents=${new_parents# $first_parent}
> - if ! do_with_author output \
> - git merge --no-ff ${strategy:+-s $strategy} -m \
> - "$msg_content" $new_parents
> + printf "%s\n" $new_parents >"$GIT_DIR"/MERGE_HEAD
> + printf "%s\n" "$msg_content" >"$GIT_DIR"/MERGE_MSG
> + if output git cherry-pick -m 1 -n "$sha1"
> then
> + do_with_author output git commit --no-verify -F "$GIT_DIR"/MERGE_MSG ||
> + die_with_patch $sha1 "Could not replay merge $sha1"
> + else
> - printf "%s\n" "$msg_content" > "$GIT_DIR"/MERGE_MSG
> - die_with_patch $sha1 "Error redoing merge $sha1"
> + die_with_patch $sha1 "Could not pick merge $sha1"
> fi
Cute. The approach looks very sensible to me.
Thanks,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-22 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-21 20:19 [PATCH/RFC] rebase -p: do not redo the merge, but cherry-pick first-parent changes Johannes Sixt
2012-05-22 18:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-22 19:30 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-05-22 23:38 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2012-05-23 15:37 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2012-05-23 18:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-23 20:41 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2012-05-24 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-24 17:47 ` Martin von Zweigbergk
2012-05-24 20:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-24 20:32 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-05-24 21:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-25 15:58 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-05-25 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-05-25 20:03 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-05-23 18:59 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120522233821.GA31667@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.kw.w@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=stephen@exigencecorp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).