From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH WIP 0/3] top-level gitignore considered less harmful Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 17:45:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20120526214529.GA29463@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1338035474-4346-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat May 26 23:45:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SYOo8-0004cv-U4 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 26 May 2012 23:45:57 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755048Ab2EZVpc convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2012 17:45:32 -0400 Received: from 99-108-226-0.lightspeed.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([99.108.226.0]:56797 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752230Ab2EZVpb (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 May 2012 17:45:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 24487 invoked by uid 107); 26 May 2012 21:45:59 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Sat, 26 May 2012 17:45:58 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 26 May 2012 17:45:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 08:25:54PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Nguy=E1=BB=85n Th=C3=A1i Ng=E1=BB=8D= c Duy wrote: > > The result is not so impressive (i'm on -O0 though). Old webkit.git= , > > before: >=20 > (it's "git status" by the way) >=20 > > > > real =C2=A0 =C2=A00m6.418s > > user =C2=A0 =C2=A00m5.561s > > sys =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0m0.827s > > > > after: > > > > real =C2=A0 =C2=A00m5.262s > > user =C2=A0 =C2=A00m4.407s > > sys =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0m0.850s >=20 > and with your patch to redistribute .gitignore in webkit, so top-leve= l > is small again: >=20 > real 0m4.185s > user 0m3.271s > sys 0m0.905s >=20 > so my numbers look "ok". Is that last number just with the redistribution, or with the redistribution _and_ your patch? I'd like to see both to see whether it is the case that the two optimizations work together for combined benefit, or if doing one makes the other one pointless. -Peff