From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Wong Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] git-svn: don't create master if another head exists Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:16:59 +0000 Message-ID: <20120625041659.GA5785@dcvr.yhbt.net> References: <20120624220835.GA4762@beczulka> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Marcin Owsiany X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 25 06:17:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj0k3-000860-PE for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 06:17:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751232Ab2FYERB (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:17:01 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:40790 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750853Ab2FYERA (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:17:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71189331E8; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120624220835.GA4762@beczulka> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Marcin Owsiany wrote: > git-svn insists on creating the "master" head (unless it exists) on every > "fetch". While it is useful that it gets created initially (users expect this > git convention), some users find it annoying that it gets recreated, especially > when they would like the git branch names to follow SVN repository branch > names. More background in > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/115030 > > Make git-svn skip the "master" creation if there is another head ref pointing > to the same place. This means "master" does get created on initial "clone" but > does not get recreated once a user deletes it. Sounds reasonable to me. Thanks for following up on this after all this time :) > Signed-off-by: Marcin Owsiany > --- > git-svn.perl | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/git-svn.perl b/git-svn.perl > index 0b074c4..90f3d06 100755 > --- a/git-svn.perl > +++ b/git-svn.perl > @@ -1613,6 +1613,8 @@ sub post_fetch_checkout { > } > > my $valid_head = verify_ref('HEAD^0'); > + my @heads_commits = eval { command(qw(show-ref --heads --hash)) }; > + return if $valid_head and grep { $_ eq $valid_head } @heads_commits; I (and I believe most git hackers) prefer C-style "&&" for boolean expressions: return if $valid_head && grep { $_ eq $valid_head } @heads_commits; "and" is lower precedence and best reserved for control flow: -f $file and print "File: $file exists!\n"; There's no logical difference in this case, but "&&" is probably easier for C programmers to read. I'll just swap "and" for "&&" and push unless there's any objection from you.