From: Pete Wyckoff <pw@padd.com>
To: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Horowitz <mike@horowitz.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] git p4: remove unused P4Submit interactive setting
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 09:53:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120714135307.GA27609@padd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120705123010.GA31388@padd.com>
pw@padd.com wrote on Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:30 -0400:
> luke@diamand.org wrote on Thu, 05 Jul 2012 08:20 +0100:
> > On 04/07/12 14:34, Pete Wyckoff wrote:
> > >The code is unused. Delete.
> >
> > I've used that non-interactive code path in the past, in the very
> > early days of using it (setting interactive to false manually).
> >
> > The nice thing about it is that if you're using git-p4 for the very
> > first time it lets you do the final submission to p4 by hand,
> > without having to trust the script to do the right thing. Once I
> > convinced myself that git-p4 was doing the right thing, I then
> > stopped using it.
> >
> > Is it worth retaining, perhaps fixed so that it can be set on the
> > command line and documented? Or just discard?
>
> My biggest complaint is that there's no way to enable the option.
> You have to edit the code to change self.interactive to False, as
> you pointed out.
>
> Then it doesn't help you with the submit message, and doesn't
> do the little details of cleaning up pure-copied files or
> changing the username for preserveUser.
>
> What you're doing makes sense, though, but maybe there's a
> cleaner way to provide that functionality.
>
> We could build the change then say "type p4 submit -c ... if it
> looks good". Still doesn't handle the little details.
>
> We could spawn a shell to let them go inspect.
>
> We could try to implement a "--continue" option, and give them
> a chance to edit.
>
> I've got an upcoming series that changes the interaction loop on
> conflict, and makes it easier to do some interaction at each
> patch, possibly before applying too. Might make things easier.
I did code up two new options to "git p4 submit":
--dry-run : just show the commits that would be submitted
--prepare-p4-only : open/add, apply patch, but do not submit
The latter prints a rather lengthy message about how to submit
or revert the changes. It fills the role of self.interactive,
hopefully.
I'll send the patches out for review once the other in-flight
changes have settled.
-- Pete
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-14 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-04 13:34 [PATCH 0/3] git p4: notice Jobs: section in submit Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-04 13:34 ` [PATCH 1/3] git p4: remove unused P4Submit interactive setting Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-04 13:49 ` Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-05 7:20 ` Luke Diamand
2012-07-05 12:30 ` Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-14 13:53 ` Pete Wyckoff [this message]
2012-07-04 13:34 ` [PATCH 2/3] git p4 test: refactor marshal_dump Pete Wyckoff
2012-07-04 13:34 ` [PATCH 3/3] git p4: notice Jobs lines in git commit messages Pete Wyckoff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120714135307.GA27609@padd.com \
--to=pw@padd.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luke@diamand.org \
--cc=mike@horowitz.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).