git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>, Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Test "t/t7502-commit.sh" failed
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:12:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120726171256.GC13942@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vtxwu8orw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 09:34:27AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> >> not ok - 21 committer is automatic
> [...]
> > I am not sure that the test is really all that useful. The point seems
> > to be that we fall back to some kind of system-based ident, but that is
> > not portable.
> 
> I think the point is to make sure that the "# Committer:" line is
> given to the reader to remind that we took the codepath that comes
> up with a committer ident by using untrustworthy heuristics.  You
> are correct that the usefulness of the value of system-based ident
> varies between systems (that is why it is stripped out with sed),
> though.

Ah, right. I was led astray by the crappy test title. When viewed with
the test immediately prior (which checks that "Author:" is shown in the
template), it makes more sense.

> You earlier gave a reason why f20f387 (commit: check committer identity
> more strictly, 2012-07-23) does not have a test for it; I think the
> same reason applies why this test is unworkable.

Right. You can check this only when "git var GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT" works,
and you can check the f20f387 behavior only when it does _not_ work. So
we could do something like:

  (sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_NAME &&
   sane_unset GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL &&
   git var GIT_COMMITTER_IDENT >/dev/null) &&
  test_set_prereq AUTOIDENT ||
  test_set_prereq NOAUTOIDENT

  test_expect_success AUTOIDENT \
    'mention auto ident in commit template'
    '...'

  test_expect_success NOAUTOIDENT \
    'git rejects bogus ident before starting editor'
    '...'

But it is somewhat unsatisfying to only get random test coverage
depending on how your system happens to be configured. I guess we
somewhat have that already with the case-insensitivity tests.

Do we want to go that route, or just drop this test completely?

> A related tangent; all the test vectors in this script seems to be
> too wide, and we probably would want to narrow them for what each
> test wants to see.  For example, the test in question only wants to
> see "# Committer: <some system based ident>" and it does not matter
> if the template was rewritten in future versions of Git so that it
> does not begin with "# Please enter...".  Similarly, the one
> previous only wants to see "# Author: <different from committer>".

Agreed. They should probably just i18ngrep for "^# Committer: " or
similar.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-26 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-26  6:27 Test "t/t7502-commit.sh" failed Jiang Xin
2012-07-26 13:03 ` Jeff King
2012-07-26 16:34   ` Junio C Hamano
2012-07-26 17:12     ` Jeff King [this message]
2012-07-26 19:25       ` Junio C Hamano
2012-07-26 19:33         ` Jeff King
2012-07-26 20:04           ` Junio C Hamano
2012-07-26 20:26           ` [PATCH 0/6] t7502 fixes Jeff King
2012-07-26 20:27             ` [PATCH 1/6] t7502: clean up fake_editor tests Jeff King
2012-07-26 20:28             ` [PATCH 2/6] t7502: properly quote GIT_EDITOR Jeff King
2012-07-26 20:30             ` [PATCH 3/6] t7502: narrow checks for author/committer name in template Jeff King
2012-07-26 20:31             ` [PATCH 4/6] t7502: drop confusing test_might_fail call Jeff King
2012-07-26 20:32             ` [PATCH 5/6] t7502: handle systems where auto-identity is broken Jeff King
2012-07-26 20:32             ` [PATCH 6/6] t7502: test early quit from commit with bad ident Jeff King
2012-07-26 21:15             ` [PATCH 0/6] t7502 fixes Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120726171256.GC13942@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=worldhello.net@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).