git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: git-rerere vs rebase --skip
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:52:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120828215202.GB7702@glandium.org> (raw)

Hi,

In one of my workflows, I constantly rebase topic branches on top of new
upstream imports. As there are several upstream import branches, I have
similar topic branches on top of different imports.
When rebasing the topic branches, I can hit conflict resolution that I
already had to do for other topic branches on another upstream import
branch. Here, git rerere is very helpful. But sometimes, the conflict
resolution is just to skip the patch, because it was incorporated
upstream in a way that git doesn't detect, or it was obsoleted, or
whatever. In such cases, git rerere is not being helpful because it
doesn't store any information about that, and I have to check again if
that's an actual conflict to solve or a patch to skip again.

It would be helpful if there was a rebase --skip mode that would tell
rerere to record that the resolution *is* --skip.

Mike

             reply	other threads:[~2012-08-28 22:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-08-28 21:52 Mike Hommey [this message]
2012-08-28 22:55 ` git-rerere vs rebase --skip Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120828215202.GB7702@glandium.org \
    --to=mh@glandium.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).