From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:59:29 -0400 Message-ID: <20120918215929.GA30346@sigill.intra.peff.net> References: <1347882637-21766-1-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> <7vboh4tluo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20120918213617.GB2567@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Cc: git list , Junio C Hamano To: Adam Spiers X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 19 00:00:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TE5px-0000Gs-Dr for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:00:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755606Ab2IRV7c (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:59:32 -0400 Received: from 75-15-5-89.uvs.iplsin.sbcglobal.net ([75.15.5.89]:47577 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755355Ab2IRV7b (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:59:31 -0400 Received: (qmail 25987 invoked by uid 107); 18 Sep 2012 21:59:55 -0000 Received: from sigill.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.7) (smtp-auth username relayok, mechanism cram-md5) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.84) with ESMTPA; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:59:55 -0400 Received: by sigill.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:59:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120918213617.GB2567@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:36:17PM +0100, Adam Spiers wrote: > > > + say_color error "ok $test_count - $@ # TODO known breakage vanished" > > > } > > > > Also I wonder if this is still a "TODO". > > Hah, I should trust my first instincts more; my first version of the > patch dropped the "TODO", but then I put it back in because I thought > people would object :-) TODO is a special token[1] respected by TAP harnesses like "prove". I'm not sure what practical impact it has, but it should probably remain. -Peff [1] http://testanything.org/wiki/index.php/TAP_specification#TODO_tests